BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > most expensive transfer ever?

most expensive transfer ever?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
39933.29 in reply to 39933.28
Date: 7/24/2008 5:05:20 PM
New York Jests
IV.31
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
Let's say ideally you sell 1 player for $750K per year as a first or second year manager that is a big feat in my opinion. You also might buy a good player or two.

Ideally yes it is achievable if you run a good budget and train players and make smart purchases but in general I think you are overestimating a good majority of the managers. I make plenty in profit to run an effective team but I am also one of the top teams in my division and there are 16 of my divisions, a lot of teams out there don't make that much money, not that it is a lot in this economy, but still, its certainly not trivial to everyone.

This Post:
00
39933.30 in reply to 39933.29
Date: 7/24/2008 5:16:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Ideally yes it is achievable if you run a good budget and train players and make smart purchases but in general I think you are overestimating a good majority of the managers.

So the fact that the majority of the managers cannot make a halfway decent plan of managing their team is some sort of a mitigating circumstance?

Without doing any major planning, if you just buy a 'stick' and train hard for a full season, you should be able to make a million off that player. Adding 2 levels to 4 skills is achievable. That means buying a quadruple average player and selling a quadruple strong. You do the math.

Of the 6 players you train, keep 4 and sell 2, and this is 2 million right off the bat. With some careful shopping and drafting, the profit should be even better.

The case in point is that the profit from training should and does dwarf any sort of gate receipt revenue. And if any manager thinks that they can make money and prosper with gate receipts only, they're up for a rude awakening.

Or to trace back to original topic under discussion -- the fact that some guys have no clue how to manage their teams is not a legit ground for the argument 750k into some sort of a gigantic sum.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
39933.31 in reply to 39933.28
Date: 7/24/2008 5:54:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
If you cannot train a player for sale that's worth at least 750k, you have a problem. If you think you should keep all players you train, you have an even bigger problem.



gratulation!!you unterstand the reason why poeple play this game!!biggest crap i ever read!!!


Cheers

This Post:
00
39933.32 in reply to 39933.31
Date: 7/24/2008 6:00:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
If you cannot train a player for sale that's worth at least 750k, you have a problem. If you think you should keep all players you train, you have an even bigger problem.

gratulation!!you unterstand the reason why poeple play this game!!biggest crap i ever read!!!

Cheers

Sure, you're right -- there are people who don't really care about winning, so they don't need to train or sell or buy players, they can lose all the same without doing that. I stand corrected.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
From: ardain

This Post:
00
39933.33 in reply to 39933.32
Date: 7/24/2008 7:53:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
Yes, you should be able to train a player and make a million. Anyone can do it with the proper 18 year old. Just buy a guy with respectable skills and hit auto train. Rinse and repeat.

The problem of BBB is that it provides a supplemental income that the average guy has no chance of ever obtaining. An extra $750k on top of training a guy and making a million is a big deal for any team. Sure you have to manage minutes, but it is not that big a deal since you already have more money to buy extra players.

No one who starts these days has any hope of catching up to the NBBA, no matter how good they are in managing their tactics and team.

From: brian

This Post:
00
39933.34 in reply to 39933.33
Date: 7/24/2008 7:57:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
An extra $750k on top of training a guy and making a million is a big deal for any team.


I made 750k extra rev from BBB, but lost prob 300k+ from the losses I took, so net prob 450k roughly (one I had to dive because of the BBB, and another from the BBB). I didn't get any extra training cause I had to play top players every game (two NBBA, BBB, and cup game). I'm only lucky I didn't lose more matches.

If there's a benefit from the BBB, at least looking at fellow US teams that made it, it's really not much at all.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: brian

This Post:
00
39933.35 in reply to 39933.33
Date: 7/24/2008 8:00:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
No one who starts these days has any hope of catching up to the NBBA, no matter how good they are in managing their tactics and team.


Tell that to Turkey Sandwiches who's tied for 2nd place.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
39933.36 in reply to 39933.33
Date: 7/24/2008 8:01:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
No one who starts these days has any hope of catching up to the NBBA, no matter how good they are in managing their tactics and team.

Exactly 1 team team from any top league participates in the B3, and one other team which might or might not be from the NBBA, per season. If you think that type of extra revenue is an obstacle for catching up -- wow!

Plus, catching up is a process. Most NBBA teams have put 4+ seasons of work in getting there, there is no reason to expect that players who start now should be able to catch up in less than that (and realistically it should take quite a bit more). This is natural.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
39933.38 in reply to 39933.37
Date: 7/24/2008 11:41:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
I dont want to add insult to inj. but I would hope even if you invest every cent you can get your hand on to buy 3 suitable trainees and give each one 12-15 skill ups (minimum in a season) you should fetch at least 4-5mil more than the price you paid..... sooner or later operating costs are going to be non existant for top teams... so you better get used to training efficiently cos for some its going to be the only way to make a real profit...

This Post:
00
39933.39 in reply to 39933.37
Date: 7/24/2008 11:47:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Plus, catching up is a process. Most NBBA teams have put 4+ seasons of work in getting there, there is no reason to expect that players who start now should be able to catch up in less than that (and realistically it should take quite a bit more). This is natural.


Just to put on the record that, in competitive countries, this claim is simply false. In the current NBBA there are only 6 teams that haven't been in the NBBA since season 3 (before that, bot cleanups shuffled the leagues in ridiculous way.). Of these only two will make the playoff.

It's true that most of us aren't so concerned with doing the most effective possible way to climb up the series (though my team has won promotion both past season, and only this season I'm in a really good league). But it's also true that it isn't clear what kind of threat the core of the NBBA faces from teams in lower leagues.

Ah also: what can you do with 350k? You can pay a *season's salary* to a player that makes 25-27k a week.

What I meant by getting there was creating a team which is able to compete on the top level, not literally getting into the top league. And team building is a process which takes multiple seasons.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
Advertisement