BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Too few high level staffs!

Too few high level staffs!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
53305.29 in reply to 53305.28
Date: 10/11/2008 7:33:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
as it says in the rules...

The level of the staff member does not impact the effectiveness of the speciality

This Post:
00
53305.30 in reply to 53305.27
Date: 10/12/2008 12:31:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
How can you ever say that's exaggerated?


even if it's just a one dollar increase per week, the thought of having weekly negotiations to the management just seems unreal...

monthly negotiations may get fewer qualms, offseason negotiations would be my own best solution, but weekly salary negotiations is just too unreal.

This Post:
00
53305.32 in reply to 53305.31
Date: 10/12/2008 1:48:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
i think by doing this also negates the possibility of again having negotiation with the trainer or any staff if they lost motivation.

though a contract is signed before, after a span of time they drop skill level prompting you to either drop him or just continue since we cant find a replacement.

since he is always motivated, and the weekly increase already constitutes for him to give you his best performance.

rather than being hopeless when he lose his drive :D i think its already good its the same as having to increase him in a big amount just to get him back to top class :D

This Post:
00
53305.33 in reply to 53305.31
Date: 10/12/2008 6:00:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
would they always have a rise in salaries? it doesn't fluctuate between rise or drop of contracts?

This Post:
00
53305.34 in reply to 53305.33
Date: 10/12/2008 8:21:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Having thought a bit more about the numbers I think it may be more difficult purely because of the times people are online.... if a staff member comes up for grabs when 800 people are online then the bidding war is likely to carry on beyond that of if the auction ends at a time when there is 200 or so people online...

With the player TL it seems to tick along even in quieter times but if the volume of staff hitting the market is too low then it might even mean downgrading to a lvl 1 if you are always being gazumped when looking for your cheaper/chosen replacement when your staff salaries are too high for you to maintain.

This Post:
00
53305.35 in reply to 53305.30
Date: 10/12/2008 10:26:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
How can you ever say that's exaggerated?


even if it's just a one dollar increase per week, the thought of having weekly negotiations to the management just seems unreal...

monthly negotiations may get fewer qualms, offseason negotiations would be my own best solution, but weekly salary negotiations is just too unreal.

It doesn't mean there are weekly negotiations. It is perfectly possible that the initial contract was negotiated with weekly increases.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
53305.36 in reply to 53305.1
Date: 10/12/2008 5:42:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
Hey! There are too few high level staffs.
Tonight there are 16 trainers available of level 6 and one of level 7. For me that is more than we need the way this has turned out. If someone can pay $1 400 000 for a level 6 trainer (Ruddy Costa), the problem must be that there are too many teams with too much money in the bank.
How can one trainer of lvl 6 be so much better than another of lvl 5 justify this amount of money?

This Post:
00
53305.37 in reply to 53305.36
Date: 10/12/2008 10:01:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155

How can one trainer of lvl 6 be so much better than another of lvl 5 justify this amount of money?


One quick answer may be people who want to train players for their National Team. Any increase in training will help their country in the long run.

I am likely to dump my players, demote and start training only U21 and NT players after I pick up a level 7 coach. I won't care anymore about how much the coach costs since I don't care too much anymore about how my team performs.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
53305.38 in reply to 53305.37
Date: 10/12/2008 10:06:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
yeah - the only legitamate teams that will buy will probably opt to train 3 MVP's single position only.

Other than this I just hope they dont fall into the hands of teams that have no aspiration of climbing the BB ladder... just those who have slipped the net and set up a secondary account to support their NT or to flood the market at a time where they happen to have just got a nice cash amount on the team they are keeping for the long term.

This Post:
00
53305.39 in reply to 53305.27
Date: 10/15/2008 12:57:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
I can't understand how that many people can judge that already, although people tend to be scared for changes. They might as well demand a salary increase of 1 single dollar per week. How can you ever say that's exaggerated?

Please stop overreacting and wait untill you know the numbers.




It's not realistic, as easy as that. The system before was much closer to reality: staff members loose with time their level, sometimes they gain a level, but they are hired for the same budget for one season at least. What staff member can afford to ask for more money every week?

Now people will pop up and say: this is just a game! but this game is based on something that exists and attracts therefore Basketball-interested people. ANd the closer it is to reality, the more it will keep attracting people. Otherwise we could say this is a fantasy game and then I am the first who will look for a different site to play.

I am not saying it is a reason for me to leave this game, and I love Buzzerbeater, but i think it should be not too far away from the real world. Inventing new rules and features is fine, but in the case of staff in my opinion unnecessary. I was much happier with the system before, as it was in my opinion also more realistic.

And I am not overreacting, I think it is overreacted to call that overreacting without asking the reasons for my opinion. ;)



Last edited by Coach Ash at 10/15/2008 12:59:05 PM

Advertisement