BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Changes in Season 10

Changes in Season 10

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
93604.296 in reply to 93604.294
Date: 7/24/2009 10:50:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
in my short overview the numbers of blocks decreased - i believed it hsould be more importent to make thehigh salary reasonable the lockers get?

Last edited by CrazyEye at 7/24/2009 10:51:42 PM

This Post:
00
93604.297 in reply to 93604.296
Date: 7/25/2009 2:04:26 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Having run extensive testing I can assure you blocks are on average more frequent. Plus help defense makes blocking more important

This Post:
00
93604.298 in reply to 93604.294
Date: 7/25/2009 2:39:39 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12051205
Second Team:
Jirkov
I know, that 3 events is not convincing, but it takes time to make more stats, because for me there is no other chance than watch whole the match. Later I'll put here complete stats of my PL match.
If there is no defender in commentary I can't know who really defended ... so for my stats it's like no defender.

Last edited by rwystyrk at 7/25/2009 2:40:07 AM

From: Marot
This Post:
00
93604.299 in reply to 93604.294
Date: 7/25/2009 9:01:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Just to ask, is that normal what happened in this game on the rebound?

http://www.buzzerbeater.com/BBWeb/boxscore.aspx?MatchID=15023681

man to man against 1-3-1 look the stadistics

14 52 against 14 50

I dunno if you think this is normal but, is really need a 15 rebound on your PF or C when PG/SG/ can take a lot of rebounds even with a 1-3-1?
The PG took 4 9 which is really a lot and SG 3 6 but with a 1-3-1 defense?

I dunno where is the sense, maybe having on the PG/SG minimum rebound 7 rather than having a high level of rebound on your PF/C, and with 1-3-1 :/



Last edited by Marot at 7/25/2009 9:02:21 AM

This Post:
00
93604.302 in reply to 93604.282
Date: 7/25/2009 11:51:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
If it had bugs, it wouldn't be released.

The GE released for the first games of the season wasn't bugged, it just didn't behave the way the BBs felt it should.

You have become a good joker recently.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
93604.303 in reply to 93604.299
Date: 7/25/2009 11:52:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Just to ask, is that normal what happened in this game on the rebound?

(15023681)


First of all till now i didn't see the game, but sometimes random could create silly results ;)

Like giving all team below averages in blocks in my 10-12 game sample, or giving here a lot of rebound for one team. Even if it was a bit silly in ym game to, where my center grabs to rebound in 36 minutes, who catch normally 12 in the same time.

So now i will look at it, and maybe edit this post^^

This Post:
00
93604.304 in reply to 93604.294
Date: 7/25/2009 12:09:25 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12051205
Second Team:
Jirkov
So, now I have complete stats of my last PL match.

1) 33% of all opponents shot has no defender in commentary - I think it would be very useful to mention defender all the time, especially now after changes in zonal defences. Is it possible to include this to GE?

2) I played 3-2 Zone to opponents Look Inside and looks like it more or less works. Number of shots close to the basket defended - C 16, PF 17, SF 1, SG 4, PG 7 (but 2 against C and other 2 against PF), 26 without defender in commentary. Especially shots of his SF was defended by my PF or C.

3) There were quite few shots mid range or 3-pointer to make any serious stats, but mid-range (including long 2 points) shots was defended - C 10, PF 2, SF 2, SG 3, PG 1, without 5 - especially 10 of C (6 of them against SF) looks quite strange. Does it means that in 3-2 zones outside player defends mainly 3-point shots?

This Post:
00
93604.305 in reply to 93604.295
Date: 7/25/2009 12:16:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
Sometimes there should be no defender. Breakaways, defensive mixups leading to wide open jumpers, great screens, faking a guy out of his jock and going to the hole... All possible instances of there being no defender. Just sayin...


Amen to that. Not sure if fast breaks are modelled at all, but I'd guess no based on my subjective impression of the rarity of short-possession layups and dunks.

Advertisement