BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > New team, Old players

New team, Old players

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
10071.3 in reply to 10071.2
Date: 12/15/2007 12:34:18 AM
Myopic Marauders
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
I thought bots in USA III weren't replaced.

Steve



Well, that could also be the bug. In either case it looks funky.

From: modred

This Post:
00
10071.4 in reply to 10071.3
Date: 12/16/2007 2:15:28 AM
Myopic Marauders
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
Bueller? Bueller?

Edited by modred (12/16/2007 2:20:18 AM CET)

Last edited by modred at 12/16/2007 2:20:18 AM

From: jimrtex

This Post:
00
10071.5 in reply to 10071.1
Date: 12/16/2007 10:25:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
The three holdovers were over the original price threshold for being FA, but under the new one.

When the first FA were released, they remained on their newly botted team while on the TL. They were also locked from being replaced. There were a few cases where a new owner would be assigned one of these bot teams, and would get 18 new players, and have holdover players who were already on the TL (the new owner could actually bid to try to keep "his" players). In one instance, the transfer appeared to not have gone through, and the new owner got the holdovers. In other cases, it appeared that a new owner may have got the money.

To fix these problems, BB moved the FA off of the bot teams at the same time they were placed on the TL. If a new owner was assigned, the players would already be off the roster.

Then BB increased the salary threshold. The few players over the new threshold continue to be removed from the rosters. But it appears that the players were over the original threshold are still being locked on the roster, but since they aren't being sold they actually remain on the team.


This Post:
00
10071.6 in reply to 10071.2
Date: 12/16/2007 10:27:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
I thought bots in USA III weren't replaced.

They weren't until this week.

From: modred

This Post:
00
10071.7 in reply to 10071.5
Date: 12/16/2007 11:32:09 AM
Myopic Marauders
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
I understand the mechanics. I want to know if it was intentional or not. It seems unbalanced.

This Post:
00
10071.8 in reply to 10071.7
Date: 12/16/2007 7:36:08 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
it was not intentional.. we forgot that we placed the threshold in two places in the code and so this problem appeared. we will fix it.

This Post:
00
10071.9 in reply to 10071.8
Date: 12/16/2007 8:10:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
So am I gonna be losing those 3 players now

From: modred
This Post:
00
10071.10 in reply to 10071.8
Date: 12/17/2007 1:37:30 AM
Myopic Marauders
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
it was not intentional.. we forgot that we placed the threshold in two places in the code and so this problem appeared. we will fix it.



Don't fix it now. I need him to beat up the rest of the league after beating me in a tv game.

From: modred
This Post:
00
10071.11 in reply to 10071.8
Date: 12/17/2007 1:38:44 AM
Myopic Marauders
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
Does that include fixing the game that they played (or at least making my fans ignore the result)? :-)

This Post:
00
10071.12 in reply to 10071.11
Date: 12/17/2007 3:58:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
So now I'm gonna lose my players, I would say thats not fair either

This Post:
00
10071.13 in reply to 10071.12
Date: 12/17/2007 4:09:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3737
The bank accidentally transfers $100,000 to your account. You earn $500 interest on that $100K for a week. The bank contacts you to point out their error. They let you keep the interest, but they take back the $100K.

Fair or not fair?

Advertisement