BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Trade Deadline is unfair

Trade Deadline is unfair

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
11948.3 in reply to 11948.2
Date: 1/9/2008 12:57:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
Actually, I'd prefer the trade deadline to be moved up to about game #16 or #18.

Steve

This Post:
00
11948.4 in reply to 11948.3
Date: 1/9/2008 1:00:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
as long as its the same rule for all... we'll get used to it.. for most of us this is our first season and money is tight so every little helps!

This Post:
00
11948.5 in reply to 11948.1
Date: 1/9/2008 1:14:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
If you're relying on TV money to be competitive in the playoffs, your team probably isn't good enough to make a deep run anyways.

The deadline has been known for awhile now, and there's been plenty of time to plan.

The TL orgy that is going on right now will dissipate once the deadline passes, and you'll be able to use that TV money to get a bargain for next season.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
11948.7 in reply to 11948.6
Date: 1/9/2008 3:13:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Juicepats defends daytrading on the ground that stuff shouldn't be forbidden without a clear reason


That's not quite what I said.

Without rehashing that thread, there's a difference between defending something and not really being concerned about something.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
11948.9 in reply to 11948.8
Date: 1/9/2008 3:29:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
No, but it was a part of it.

I just want to make sure we're clear on my position.

You might get someone (probably not, but who knows) that says "OMG THAT JERKWAD JOOCE LOVES DAYTRADERS!!!1!!11ONE1!!1!1"

Just covering my ass.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
11948.11 in reply to 11948.10
Date: 1/9/2008 4:27:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Teams that have clinched a position, might want to TIE the last game. Those who do not have a TV game aren't concerned about possibly losing to a weaker team. Those who do have a TV game face the danger of losing supporters throughout the playoffs (if they do TIE), or the loss of enthusiasm (if they do)


I suppose that's something that should be considered.

If it was set up so that TV games could not come in the last week of the season, it wouldn't really hurt my feelings.

If it stays the same, it really wouldn't bother me all that much either.

For the record, my last game, which I will be TIEing since it doesn't matter for seeding, is a TV game.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
11948.12 in reply to 11948.5
Date: 1/10/2008 1:13:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
If you're relying on TV money to be competitive in the playoffs, your team probably isn't good enough to make a deep run anyways.

The deadline has been known for awhile now, and there's been plenty of time to plan.

The TL orgy that is going on right now will dissipate once the deadline passes, and you'll be able to use that TV money to get a bargain for next season.

I never said I was relying on the money at all I was saying that other people are and that. My team is 18-2 and has been TIEing for the playoffs for well over a month without dropping a game, and I don't really need a 'superstar' player when I have a NT player and 2 borderline NT players and I'm losing money because my salaries are so high. The trade deadline doesn't really affect me much (I was planning on spending half on a player and half on an arena upgrade) but it does to a lot of people. Obviously a lot of teams will buy a superstar with their TV money just before the playoffs anyway which puts us at a disadvantage.

Plenty of time to plan? Plan around how most other teams have a $300k advantage going into the playoffs you mean? or at least they could buy players before the TL prices soar.

And yes I was planning on using the TV money on a player for next season anyway, but that doesn't make the trade deadline fair.

Edit: typos...

Edited by Inferno03 (10/01/2008 01:18:27 CET)

Last edited by Inferno03 at 1/10/2008 1:18:27 AM

This Post:
00
11948.13 in reply to 11948.12
Date: 1/10/2008 2:29:58 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.31
Overall Posts Rated:
88
moving TV games off the last game of the season sounds like a reasonable solution.. i need to check that the match works out and it would be possible to have 3 equally distributed tv games where the last game of the season is not included. It would certainly make the coding of the schedule more difficult given the way we figure out the schedule now.

forrest

Advertisement