BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Low player ratings

Low player ratings

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
125791.3 in reply to 125791.2
Date: 12/31/2009 4:25:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Don't forget the defensive matchups feature. I analyzed it a bit and it seems like he can get 7,5-8,0, when I play him as SG. Still nowhere near what I hope. I got one SG, who was described in your last paragraph, so I played Campra as a SF, what obviosly wasn't a good idea. If I should sell him, I would get a good all-rounder to take his position on SF.

Last edited by inimene at 12/31/2009 4:31:36 AM

This Post:
00
125791.4 in reply to 125791.3
Date: 12/31/2009 4:39:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
907907
I wouldn't play him as SF due the lack of OD AND the lack of Rebounds. Rebounds are important for SF.
He might play SG in offense and SF in defense but still, I don't like him...

He may get higher ratings as SG when there's a bad player against him, so he doesn't have to defend a lot.

We have both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
From: SplitJ

This Post:
00
125791.5 in reply to 125791.1
Date: 12/31/2009 4:44:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
Play him as a backup SG or against team with really bad Outside Shooting + inside offenses.

This Post:
00
125791.6 in reply to 125791.2
Date: 12/31/2009 5:30:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Such a low rating is not a big surprise with an atrocious OD, I guess...


for me a bit, because defence didn't matter in the ratings when they defend a different position ;) But i would sell him, because player without D seems uselexss for me, the other way seems to be workng better.

This Post:
00
125791.7 in reply to 125791.6
Date: 12/31/2009 5:38:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
907907
Such a low rating is not a big surprise with an atrocious OD, I guess...


for me a bit, because defence didn't matter in the ratings when they defend a different position ;)


Is that true? If I have my PG defend the opponent's SF, the PG's defense doesn't play a role in his rating? I can't imagine that :-|


We have both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
This Post:
00
125791.8 in reply to 125791.7
Date: 12/31/2009 5:45:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
(17965159) the sg defends center, the PG the PF spot.

This Post:
00
125791.9 in reply to 125791.8
Date: 12/31/2009 6:00:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
907907
Yes, and their ratings are crap because they probably don't have the skills to defend the PF and the C. So how does this support your argumentation?

Didn't you say that their defense doesn't influence the player rating if they defend out of position?

We have both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
This Post:
00
125791.10 in reply to 125791.9
Date: 12/31/2009 6:02:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Yes, and their ratings are crap because they probably don't have the skills to defend the PF and the C. So how does this support your argumentation?

Didn't you say that their defense doesn't influence the player rating if they defend out of position?


so you think the sg got a 2,5 in rating, with 60k salary and can defend the c? how do you think he is looking IS 27 ID 1 and Reb 1?

This Post:
00
125791.12 in reply to 125791.11
Date: 12/31/2009 7:00:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
he has ID 13 and reb 13, just for information and performance seems to haveN#t impa ct on the ratings. And why the quality of the opposition takes place in the player rating, in this casse i wonder why my rating usually are better then the one of a fourth league game ;)

Edit: (179651.7) here he get 11 rating with 48 min playing time ;) So IS makes the most of the rating, right? maybe 98%, because his offense uardskills ain't just ones. but if IS is the only factor for centers, why OFd is so powerrfll for guards, who are great in the offensiv game?

Last edited by CrazyEye at 12/31/2009 7:10:43 AM

Advertisement