BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Training Idea

Training Idea

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
22
164062.3 in reply to 164062.2
Date: 11/16/2010 8:36:25 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12041204
Second Team:
Jirkov
It make sense. There are plenty of other thinks which don't make sense. I'm for some changes in training options, at least more balanced as it is now, because there is no single position training for SF, no one for PF, only one for SG, but 3 for C and 3 for PG.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
22
164062.5 in reply to 164062.4
Date: 11/16/2010 12:54:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
just wait till guys like that make such improvements like an average trainee in Buzzerbeater after they are drafted.

This Post:
00
164062.6 in reply to 164062.3
Date: 11/16/2010 5:16:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
I agree with you 100% regarding this. You should be able to single train a position be it C,PF,SF,SG or PG provided the player has played minutes at that position.

But...I do not agree with the initial suggestion that a player that played C should be given training for a PG skill.

From: Korey

This Post:
00
164062.7 in reply to 164062.6
Date: 11/20/2010 5:09:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4848
Everyone saying the C at the PG skill, I was just using an example. Like you don't want a center with atrocious passing do you? But yeah, that was just an example, not that for specifics