BuzzerBeater Forums

18
Removed on TL.
(5965408)
(4785398)
(8173477)
(4727139)

Decent 17.5 here.
(7658767)
(6681746)
(9551747)
Removed on TL.
(5140325)
(4578544)
(4823078)

edit Just adding to the list.

This is all for now.

Last edited by FannyPackMan at 12/15/2010 1:03:51 PM

I would look at veteran (experienced players) in lower leagues who only average 4-10 minutes/game. Like a good playmaker C on a bot team, or a good rebounder PG, because we all know bot teams put their best C at PG, PF/SG, SF/SF SG/PF and PG/C.

If anyone put a big man as PG,SG or SF,or a guard as Pf or C,it's almost impossible they have so high rating,because their great skills are useless for that role

I highly doubt the player could last in div IV so we are looking at div I, II and III.
Which means we need to check 21 leagues per country.
So 336 teams per country.....ummm GL.

Maybe check all leagues and just look at league leader boards so we could see standout players?

Last edited by FannyPackMan at 12/15/2010 8:10:35 PM

I guess I should be honored that I trained the #1 best player in the world, but I am just annoyed that having such a good player doesn't really help a team that much.

I had to sell him because he couldn't even keep me in division 3.

Would Lebron James or Deron Williams ever lose even a single game in a low level league like that? They could easily score 75 points a night against Division 3 competition, so there's something that needs to be done about the balance here. The world's best player should be able to single-handedly propel his team to at least the country's second division, regardless of the talent around him. After all, if Allen Iverson could get to the NBA finals all by himself, why couldn't Joe Bronson do the same?

I could buy a guard for 1/10 the salary of Bronson and he'd give me 90% of the performance level while saving me tons of money. That shouldn't be the case. A guy getting 200000+ a week should be worth 200000+ a week. Otherwise, the salaries need to come down a ton.

Agree!