BuzzerBeater Forums

That may be true but my point was that you can't segment the market so people from 1 country pay a less price than another.

Everyone has to pay the same price adjusted for 1 currency in this case USD

That may be true but my point was that you can't segment the market so people from 1 country pay a less price than another.

Everyone has to pay the same price adjusted for 1 currency in this case USD

i believe they asked this in the survey, and at least it would be ok when countrys with fewer income pay less for supporter then people from our countrys.

Maybe you could say it is unfair, but when you see that people in germany/USA earn more much money in a week which people had in Kongo to spend for a year you couldn't ask for the same price.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28...

+1
I'm completely agree with you.Ukraine isn't a poor country, but $ 40 is a lot for students....

It would be beneficial in finance for the owner of the site. Сhoose the optimal marketing proposal to attract more finance to more managers. in Ukraine, 40$ is 50% of scholarship students and 25% of the minimum wage.

Last edited by AlexUnder at 5/29/2011 6:44:52 AM

Even though, I'm from the U.S. I'm all for this idea. This is a world wide game. People from the US and certain European countries(Britain, France,etc.) can afford the current supporter. But there are many countries where many players don't bother to be supporter because they can not afford it, so they price should be adjusted for these countries.

+1 I'm completely agree with you

there are poor people in every where and rich people also

i think its easy to find a poor man with internet conexion in usa or europe than in africa or asia

i won't say it so, lot of people in Asia have internet, but live with much less money even a poor american have for live. You see the answer from the ukrainian guys in this thread, how much money a student have theire to life - and ukrainian ain't at the bottom ;) And when you spend 12 bucks there without even thinking of it, you are rich while i think a american poor people still have 12 bucks left for some "unimportant" pleasurs and that no only every three month when he needed it.

Actually, as long as no-ingame advantage is given to supporters, I don´t see no reason for jealousy.

Obviously you have more interest in the big-market customers when advertising, so those "getting lost" because of them beeing supporters decreases the advertisement income alot more than (no offense meant) some greenland player would.

So a supportership from Greenland has obviously another value than a supportership from let´s say the US of A. Why shouldn´t you offer a fair deal for those people playing BB in Greendland now, if the only outcome might be that you attract more players from Greenland?

Supportership might help develop small market countries, aswell as small countries, no matter if they are poor or not. But the less interest companies have in paying for advertising in those markets, the less money you lose by letting them purchase supportership for a lower price.

So to be honest: it doesn´t take anything away from me if people in Ukraine - students and pubils and such - gain supportership on a discount. So unless supportership suddenly generates in game benefits: why should I bother?

Last edited by LA-seelenjaeger at 5/29/2011 5:48:55 PM

My Father and many of Bulgarian peoples works for 4560 $ per Year or 380 $ per Month or 14 $ per day. I'm student and I can't afford yearly supporter .