BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > 1-3-1

1-3-1

Set priority
Show messages by
From: zecchin

This Post:
00
210493.3 in reply to 210493.2
Date: 2/15/2012 10:33:23 AM
Alley Up
IV.29
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
1st one. I'm damn sure. Confirmed by GM-Jason.

thank you :-)

From: Lucifer

This Post:
00
210493.4 in reply to 210493.3
Date: 2/15/2012 10:44:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
108108
No problem!

"Falling in love is not at all the most stupid thing that people do but gravitation cannot be held responsible for it."
From: ezlife

This Post:
00
210493.5 in reply to 210493.2
Date: 2/15/2012 1:06:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
127127
Does that mean that the C actually defends the wings at 0 degrees? So he would need some OD?

--> better swap PF and C in defense?

From: Lucifer

This Post:
00
210493.6 in reply to 210493.5
Date: 2/15/2012 11:46:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
108108
Yes, but it shouldn't matter. Do not swap PF and C. Because first of all, the opponent will have to get past your PG,SG,SF and PF to reach your C, and if he is good enough to get past them, then most likely he is good enough to beat your C too. If you swap C and PF, one of your flanks or center will remain weak, because your C's OD will suck, so its better to just leave things as they are. And chances are, if your opponents get past SG,PG,SF and PF, they would have come SO far in that they would have to take an Inside Shot, and your C has the best ID, now doesn't he?

"Falling in love is not at all the most stupid thing that people do but gravitation cannot be held responsible for it."
From: zecchin

This Post:
00
210493.7 in reply to 210493.5
Date: 2/16/2012 9:39:26 AM
Alley Up
IV.29
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Does that mean that the C actually defends the wings at 0 degrees? So he would need some OD?

--> better swap PF and C in defense?

for this way I ever knew that PF is the last man in this tactic, in real is like that...so I would a confirm by a BB, because it is strange...

This Post:
00
210493.8 in reply to 210493.7
Date: 2/16/2012 10:24:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i know it played with guard below the basket cause they are fast, maybe you could ask it in the Ask a bb thread in the global.(or maybe the assigment the C have there, if he don't protect the corners here the c is placed well).

This Post:
00
210493.9 in reply to 210493.8
Date: 2/16/2012 10:37:00 AM
Alley Up
IV.29
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
i know it played with guard below the basket cause they are fast, maybe you could ask it in the Ask a bb thread in the global.(or maybe the assigment the C have there, if he don't protect the corners here the c is placed well).

yes, but that must not be a question for "ask to BBs", but a FAQ -_-'

on this kind of question GMs must be answer without problems...

This Post:
00
210493.10 in reply to 210493.9
Date: 2/16/2012 11:33:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I am not sure, if you mean that me as a GM should have more insight in game mechanics, but the BB policy was always more about let the users explore.

This Post:
11
210493.11 in reply to 210493.10
Date: 2/16/2012 2:07:26 PM
Alley Up
IV.29
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
I am not sure, if you mean that me as a GM should have more insight in game mechanics, but the BB policy was always more about let the users explore.

but I don't want know how work the 1-3-1...I just wanna know the position of players in this tactic...after it's my problem discover if C needs more OD or not, or if PF needs more rebounds on not, or if i need a defensive switch in this tactic...but i must know the players position...obvioulsy i not pretend that GMs sould say how work this tactic, just player position..

these are things that should be on FAQ, and GM should say...just that...

This Post:
00
210493.12 in reply to 210493.11
Date: 2/16/2012 6:09:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
In real life the SG plays the bottom and runs the baseline, covering the corners correct?

This Post:
00
210493.13 in reply to 210493.12
Date: 2/16/2012 7:59:05 PM
Alley Up
IV.29
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
In real life the SG plays the bottom and runs the baseline, covering the corners correct?

the SG or the PF too, or SF..depend...
numerical position is:
1
2-5-3
4
so, in this way, 4 is the PF...
but usually in real is a rapid player, because he has to cover the corners...for that he needs much OD in BB..but if we don't know the distribution player in BB in this tactic, we cannot know if is correct leave SG in SG or switch him with PF, etc...

Advertisement