BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Interim/Assistant NT Coach

Interim/Assistant NT Coach

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
225060.3 in reply to 225060.1
Date: 8/24/2012 3:13:49 PM
Hamburg Albatrosses
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
82908290
Second Team:
Korean S. Fighters
I also like this suggestion - and see no harm in implementing that. Would be really nice if that idea was taken into account!

Du hast nicht genug Geld, um dieses Gebot abzugeben!
This Post:
00
225060.4 in reply to 225060.3
Date: 8/25/2012 12:35:02 PM
Kings XI Punjab
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
221221
Second Team:
Kings XI Punjab II
+1 Great idea as India suffered from the same problem( coach was not having much internet access in his 4th term)

This Post:
00
225060.6 in reply to 225060.5
Date: 8/27/2012 6:10:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
172172
I agree. If a guy announces beforehand who his "emergency caretaker" will be, then it's fine. Otherwise you may end up having the NT controlled for a large period of time by someone who wasn't elected.

From: Bballin

This Post:
00
225060.7 in reply to 225060.6
Date: 8/27/2012 8:40:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
968968
Since the guy is an emergency caretaker, then he wont be used very often. I havent seen too many situations where an "emergency caretaker" was actually needed, so no I dont think the NT would be controlled by someone who wasnt elected for a long period of time.

This would actually allow for some type of "succession" plan with NT/U21 managers, choose someone who is interested in being the U21 or NT manager in the future and let them choose a lineup once or twice.

Also, I think if you vote for someone to be your countries NT/U21 manager then you have faith in their decisions, so you should have faith in the person they choose to be an assistant.

From: abigfishy

This Post:
11
225060.11 in reply to 225060.6
Date: 8/29/2012 3:09:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
809809
I agree. If a guy announces beforehand who his "emergency caretaker" will be, then it's fine. Otherwise you may end up having the NT controlled for a large period of time by someone who wasn't elected.


what is worse

the team being run by some1 not elected

or

the team being run by no1 @ all?

This Post:
00
225060.13 in reply to 225060.12
Date: 8/29/2012 3:22:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
968968
because a guy who is ban or botified will evidently not be able to chose it after his depart.


With my suggestion, the idea was that they choose a person after the election and they have one week to do so.

Although I see the benefits with choosing beforehand and would not be against that.

Advertisement