Not sure I understand exactly what you're suggesting. You're saying we could have some kind of ranking that would say "Player X is the 43894th best SG in Buzzerbeater and the 3463rd best SG playing in the US", is that the idea? I guess it doesn't hurt anything, but I don't really see the point. In most cases it won't tell you much. In bbtools (the site is currently down) you can rank the best players in a given country, or look at the best under 21, but besides that there's not much use for a ranking. Having the 1000th best guy or the 1500th best really doesn't tell you much at all. To see if they're better or worse than the guys you're facing in your next league match you already have salaries, ratings, stats, etc
My 7700guard constantly outplays 15-35k guards
My 7700guard constantly outplays 15-35k guardsThat's means you're getting good value for money ;) Are those other guards in bad gameshape? Sometimes players can have high salaries by being one-dimensional (e.g. having huge JS and nothing else). Maybe your guy has nice secondary skills. Can you post links to some of those games you're mentioning?In any case, I'm sure you understand that this has to be the exception and not the rule. Imagine that you're given two "blank" players and you can choose their skills. With a salary of 35k you can, in general, build a much better player than with less than 8k in salary.
