BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Some tactic questions

Some tactic questions

Set priority
Show messages by
From: knave

This Post:
00
241512.3 in reply to 241512.2
Date: 5/10/2013 6:38:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
Well, I expect my OD to be about 3 levels higher than his flow. My SF is definitely outside orientated, so I guess I should go for 3-2, even though this will make my ID about 2,5-3 levels lower than his IS ... ?
My PG, SG and SF have around 12-13 JR, but JS goes about an average of 16 ... so considering this do you think Motion is gonna work better than RnG?

This Post:
00
241512.4 in reply to 241512.3
Date: 5/10/2013 11:28:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
IMO, Motion almost always works better than RNG and personally I would never use 3-2 against LI offense. M2M, even 2-3 is a better choice. But if you're strongest offense is usually an inside based offense, I would completely ignore his defensive ratings and go with that.

Last edited by Beener not Beanerz at 5/10/2013 11:28:27 AM

This Post:
00
241512.5 in reply to 241512.4
Date: 5/10/2013 4:47:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
No, my stronger offence is definitely any outside one, and as I said my guards are in good form.
My concern is more about my defence. He will play LI, and only 2-3 from my side will match his IS rating, but it will leave me with too low OD and RB (however, his OS rating will be about as low as my OD).

Last edited by knave at 5/10/2013 4:48:25 PM

From: Big Dogs

This Post:
00
241512.6 in reply to 241512.5
Date: 5/10/2013 4:58:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
Like Manon said, if your players have good OD/ID, along with some SB, you might be able to run a 2-3. But 9 times out of 10, I would just use M2M.

From: knave
This Post:
00
241512.7 in reply to 241512.6
Date: 5/11/2013 9:39:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
So I have decide to play Motion and MM. I will keep you updated about this game! :D Thanks for the help guys.

From: knave
This Post:
00
241512.8 in reply to 241512.7
Date: 5/11/2013 1:14:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
So, unfortunately, I lost... I think he got to good RB rating that I couldn't match ...
(56245281)

From: Big Dogs

This Post:
00
241512.9 in reply to 241512.8
Date: 5/11/2013 4:17:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
432432
So, unfortunately, I lost... I think he got to good RB rating that I couldn't match ...


His bigs really did a number on you inside, but I like that prolific rating you put up for Outside Scoring.