BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Australia > National Team Debate Thread

National Team Debate Thread (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
256421.3 in reply to 256421.2
Date: 4/1/2014 3:28:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
I'll think about it if no one else is running probably (because I have the time at the moment). But I'll see who the other candidates are first

This Post:
00
256421.4 in reply to 256421.3
Date: 4/1/2014 3:34:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12661266
Nice. Would you if you got it be looking for more then one term or just whatever happens?

This Post:
00
256421.5 in reply to 256421.4
Date: 4/1/2014 3:42:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
214214
Hi guys. Just a quick note that i won't be running for election again this season.

While i think we definitely improved as a team, i didn't have the time to properly integrate with the U21 and development as much as i wanted to so time to get some new blood in i think (or old blood if mllama is running :P ).

Good luck to whoever gets the spot and i'll always be around for advice or whatever if needed.

From: mllama

This Post:
00
256421.6 in reply to 256421.5
Date: 4/1/2014 3:43:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
Old blood. Pfft. Your team is older than mine. Just. ;)

This Post:
00
256421.7 in reply to 256421.4
Date: 4/1/2014 3:44:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
I'd keep going for two terms if I thought I was the best candidate for the job at the time. That all depends on time, enthusiasm etc, I guess. And if I run this time! ;)

This Post:
00
256421.8 in reply to 256421.7
Date: 4/1/2014 4:03:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12661266
You should. A some point I plan on stepping down on 21 NT and running for NT. But not for a little bit.

This Post:
11
256421.9 in reply to 256421.2
Date: 4/1/2014 4:12:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
Ok, I've thrown my hat in, since Dire has confirmed he isn't running, so I'll answer your questions.

Two goals: Make it to the world cup (and make a reasonable impact) and leave the team in better shape for the next manager than it was before. I've outlined in my speech my plans, beyond that, its simply a case of picking the right players and picking the right tactics - I'll let my experience speak for those.

As for working with the U21 team, I assume you are talking about player development. My opinion there is that a player is the U21 coaches to do develop as they see fit until they hit 22, and then they become the NT manager's responsibility. There are some exceptions though - if I feel that a player is being developed in a way that is seriously detrimental to the NT, then I'd request the U21 manager to go down a different path (for example, if a HoF player was being developed to be a single skill monster that no team would ever be able to afford and would be retired by the time he was 25, then I'd have a word). The second exception would be a MVP/HoF player who was clearly not going to make the 21s - in that case I think there is a strong case for the NT manager to take over early. Identifying which players those are would be a matter of collaboration.

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
256421.10 in reply to 256421.9
Date: 4/1/2014 5:11:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
First I want to thank Dire for his fantastic work over the last few seasons. Second I would like to say how lucky we are to have millama running. Two of the best ever back to back, we are blessed. But a question, what can you do to encourage some people to train some top SG and PF players which we seem to have lacked a bit in recent seasons where everyone was a PG or a C?

From: mllama

This Post:
00
256421.11 in reply to 256421.10
Date: 4/1/2014 6:06:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
Hard to say without looking at all the prospects we have coming through, but looking at the team I don't think our problem is a lack of SGs or PFs in the NT - its more that there is a touch of 'sameness' about the players. Lots of combo guards, lots of bigs with a heap of one on one training, but I wouldn't mind a couple of guys who specialise in certain offenses - a really high JR guard, for example, if we want to play outside, or a couple of high driving/passing/IS guys for inside offenses. I think with the GDP, it is definitely important now to avoid becoming too predictable - whereas in the past the PG/C approach was probably the best one.

To get people to train that way - I guess its just a matter of guiding people's training plans, and I think getting a person in the NT is a pretty strong motivator.

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
256421.12 in reply to 256421.11
Date: 4/1/2014 8:45:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
So you don't want SGs or PFs but guards with high JR and bigs who are good at JS...

From: mllama

This Post:
00
256421.13 in reply to 256421.12
Date: 4/1/2014 5:09:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
No - my point was more that I don't think we have a PG/C team at the moment. We have more of a combo guard/PF team - but with those PFs all looking pretty similar. Getting some of those combo guards to specialise in becoming SGs (and PGs as well) would be ideal, yes.

Advertisement