you just want an easy game, quicker, with more rewards, where you wouldn't need to connect too much. 6 years I'm playing this game, I'm not for that.
No he doens't, in fact the ideas from 5 to last, are not even his, are mine. I came with them in 5 seconds when we were talking about the u24 Nt idea, which i told him, imo, was just plain stupid, because most people dont care about the 2 that we already have, spending time in one more was pointless specially when the game have strutural problems that require time and thinking to be fixed, so you stop losing people and start getting people again.
As for the first idea, the Auto Scrimmage one, i dont just much point is arguing about it. Its just pure lazyness.
All games i now and/or play have that feature. So i wonder how do they live??? Dont they do people online and ads??? Then how do they live? Yeah. That excuse was just plain pathetic. I could dig if you said the time was needed to fix something more important, but that one just made me laugh. An Auto-Scrimmage has no downside. Not one, not a single one. We dont have it because BBs didn't care do make one, unlike all other games i might add again. Making one so-not-important-thing as arranging scrimmages wont loose any money, and making life easier for your users will make then happier, and making them happier...money for you. There are features that help, yes that is true, but they still require the other part, they dont depent only on one click, on your will. With an auto-scrimmage you could be relax because you would new that you would have one next time you loged in. And you could spend your time on the game doing other, more important, stuff. Like..read the foruns.
As the new training, it would make life easier, yes. For more experience users, you can train players well anyway, but its just plain ridiculous to have to play guy out of position in competitive games to get them the right training, which is UNREALISTIC. BBs want the players to be more all-around and balanced, but make some trainings harder. Its unrealistic, and unnecessary hard to give some trainings. Make new training schedules and you might see more balanced players in the future. Would this make the game easier? Yes it would. But also less frustrating, for people training because would require less games out off positions and losses because of it.
As for enthusiasm, its broken. Right now, most people just play TIE all the way as if there was no other options. And add to that the behind-the-curtains agreements who have an unfair effect on competitiveness. It's important to make agreements less interesting and/or enthusiasm an option that actually is put in play and counts without people playing the same way. My personal choise would be to get rid of it altogether. There are not enthusias in PL or BB and they are just fine. If its to keep it, then make it harder and a bigger component. How? As i suggested. Hide each team effort would help ending the agreements unless they really reaaaally trust each other, problem would be everyone would just play TIE anyway, so, if it was to keep it, complexifying it could do the trick. Having more levels would allow people to "rest" the team while having more effort than opponents, giving an actual chance of mattering again, specially in the information was dubious "Team X have more effort than team Y" would just appear if there was more than 3 levels of effort on a 1-10 scale. There is some problems with this, most people would probably just settle as playing at level 3 for example (High resting level) but there would be more options and more variety of option and would make the game more unpredictable.
Having enthusiasm attach to game shape would be a nice touch, imo. Because it would make minutes management more dificult and require more caution from teams, specially without GS training as i wanted as well. But would allow different strategies to be able to play less or more your players.
Last edited by Floki at 9/19/2014 1:10:31 PM