BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > 24 teams in the European Championship final

24 teams in the European Championship final

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
322429.3 in reply to 322429.1
Date: 12/19/2023 1:43:18 AM
Cobra Kai
III.10
Overall Posts Rated:
422422
Second Team:
Wu Tang Clan
This is a really nice suggestion, it will give smaller nations and their coaches more motivation to compete and build their national teams

This Post:
11
322429.4 in reply to 322429.1
Date: 12/19/2023 2:45:26 AM
BC Elkaaria
Kõrgliiga
Overall Posts Rated:
388388
Second Team:
Elkaaria Grasshoppers
I would support that also.
Would make groups somewhat breathable in Europe. Right now you are pretty much qualified for consolation tournament if you didn't get favourable schedule and are not top 10 team in BB.

Last edited by SiimV at 12/19/2023 2:47:04 AM

This Post:
22
322429.5 in reply to 322429.1
Date: 12/19/2023 3:54:09 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12041204
Second Team:
Jirkov
Basic idea looks fine, but the system is also very important. There are 14 weeks in every season, what is your idea? Now the system is:
Week 1 - scrimmage
Weeks 2 to 8 - group stage
Weeks 9 to 13 - second group stage
Week 14 - semifinal (friday) and final (monday)
How would you change it to be able to compete 24 teams in second phase?

This Post:
00
322429.7 in reply to 322429.1
Date: 12/19/2023 4:37:25 AM
Vilkiukai
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
429429
Second Team:
Vilkiukai II
I do not see the reason to. It is very simple, goal of EC is to win medals. And for some extent to qualify for WC now,
Weaker teams without ent. In second round wouldnt manage to achieve any of this anyways.

I suggest maybe some ranked games as they do jn WC.

But for PO at consolidation i suggest to do it esports style. Like CS, upper lower brackets, so team with 1 loss in PO can still win it all. Because nowadays it is just toomuch random, especially with gdp.

This Post:
00
322429.8 in reply to 322429.1
Date: 12/19/2023 4:45:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
It's not that good idea, in my opinion.

Current number of qualified teams is determined partially because of easier organization of second phase of tournament, I guess. If you just want to increase number of qualified teams, you couldn't do it with existing tournament organization that easy.

1) If you would like to keep all-play-all system you would need to increase number of matches and that means you would need to play 2 games in one week at some point.

2) I suppose you could increase number of groups in second phase from 2 to 4, but then only the first team from those groups would go in the semifinals. Also, if you increase number of those groups, you would have 2 second-phase groups with 2 teams that won in their first-phase groups. So you would need to decrease number of groups in first phase from 6 to 4. That doesn't look nice to me, 4 groups 12 teams, first 6 advancing to second phase.

3) You could lose all-play-all system, I guess, but in that case, every season would have teams who complains that their schedule isn't fair, that it is harder than someone else's.

I mean, yeah... Maybe we could get some new feature to break this monotony, but with your suggestion, maximum we would get, is a little bit of shuffle of group sizes and nothing more. I don't think that admins are willing to change core of their tournament organization.

This Post:
55
322429.9 in reply to 322429.5
Date: 12/19/2023 5:08:09 AM
SUMY DEVILS
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
13281328
Basic idea looks fine, but the system is also very important. There are 14 weeks in every season, what is your idea? Now the system is:
Week 1 - scrimmage
Weeks 2 to 8 - group stage
Weeks 9 to 13 - second group stage
Week 14 - semifinal (friday) and final (monday)
How would you change it to be able to compete 24 teams in second phase?


Week 1 - scrimmage
Weeks 2 to 7- group stage 12 groups × 4 teams (3 games at home and 3 away)
Weeks 8 to 10 - second group stage 6 groups ×4 teams (3 games) 16 best teams advances from group to 1/8 play-off.
Weeks 11 to 14 - 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, final.

I see a lot of advantages, top teams in small groups will not be able to accumulate enthusiasm (or they will have to take risks to accumulate enthusiasm) and will be wary of every opponent.

This Post:
11
322429.10 in reply to 322429.9
Date: 12/19/2023 5:17:34 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12041204
Second Team:
Jirkov
16 best teams advances from 6 groups .... please no, I don't like these system 4 best of 3rd place.

This Post:
00
322429.11 in reply to 322429.10
Date: 12/19/2023 5:29:21 AM
SUMY DEVILS
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
13281328
16 best teams advances from 6 groups .... please no, I don't like these system 4 best of 3rd place.

I don't like system where top teams accumulate enthusiasm in long group distance, it's not interesting. Maybe you have better suggestions about it?

This Post:
00
322429.13 in reply to 322429.11
Date: 12/19/2023 5:43:54 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12041204
Second Team:
Jirkov
I'm more or less fine with current system.

But if I have to think of change with 24 teams in second phase it should look like this:
1) First stage 8 groups of 6 teams, advance for top 3 of each group - 5 weeks
Big disadvantage - 24 eliminated teams would end 2 weeks earlier than now, maybe could exist some other tournament for them
2) second stage 4 groups of 6 teams - 5 weeks more
advance for 2 or 4 of each group
3) playoff - for 8 or 16 teams - 3 weeks, in case of 16 teams semifinal on Friday es it's now

I think enthusiasm is another problem, maybe there could be some change of this system, maybe less drop of enthusiasm in case of CT, lower limit of max enthusiasm or somethink like this. Then we could see more surprising results.

Last edited by rwystyrk at 12/19/2023 6:23:33 AM

Advertisement