BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Defensive Rebound to Dunk in 1 second?

Defensive Rebound to Dunk in 1 second?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Rambo

This Post:
00
34999.3 in reply to 34999.2
Date: 6/9/2008 11:46:29 AM
New York Jests
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
It is not physically possible for one team to shoot the ball with one second remaining and have it be rebounded and thrown the entire length of the court and dunked in one second. It is absolutely an error in the game engine, it should not be an event that is allowed to occur goign forward.

I remember seeing this being discussed before but couldn't find any of the old threads where people reported a defensive rebound and an offensive dunk within one second. I thought it had been resolved but I guess it fell through the cracks.

If anyone else ahs any other information please share.

Thanks,

This Post:
00
34999.4 in reply to 34999.3
Date: 6/9/2008 12:03:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
One of my players took a defensive rebound and then dunked it in the same minute. It has to be said that it was the final seconds so it might be that there is some bugs linked with at the buzzer shots...

Sometimes I think, sometimes I don't
This Post:
00
34999.5 in reply to 34999.4
Date: 6/9/2008 12:52:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
as the games are calculated by the game-engine it is possible some 'theoretically' impossible stuff can happen. Ofcourse this is something that lowers the quality of the game, but it is not necessarily bad. If the game engine decides your team should loose, it could as well make a trow from under 1 ring to the other and make it a 3 pointer. It is just in the way it is shown in the engine.

Since it is not 'bad' now, it might be no priority. But since it would improve the game, I'm sure BBs will get to it when they see a chance.

The fact your thread was closed does not mean BBs will not look at it. your suggestion was made, there is no reason for discussion. The GE could be improved on this area, and probably will in the future. For now we will have to live with the way it is.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
34999.6 in reply to 34999.5
Date: 6/9/2008 1:21:55 PM
New York Jests
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
I agree that if the engine "decides that I should lose" I will lose no matter what. The point isn't that I lost so much as this is a problem with the engine. As you said it is a relatively minor problem and I agree with that.

I would have been perfectly fine with a full court shot to win the game instead. Again, I don't expect my results to change or anything like that I just wanted to raise the scenario so people were aware of it and could begin to think about fixing it.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
34999.7 in reply to 34999.6
Date: 6/9/2008 1:27:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Maybe it just a try from the BB to let the match viewer look like a real live ticker *crunch*



This Post:
00
34999.8 in reply to 34999.6
Date: 6/9/2008 3:24:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
indeed, I got your point, and I agree, some events could be tweaked, but overall I think the engine provides prety nice results.

I'm sure the BBs know it could be tweaked. another much suggested item is to add block-events.
I'm sure some day they'll get to it and optimize it a bit, but I fear they have too much work they still should get too.

Any way, what I wanted to tell you was that even your thread was closed, the suggestion probably will make it trough. Thought that might be nice for you to know. ;)

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
34999.9 in reply to 34999.6
Date: 6/9/2008 3:25:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
indeed, I got your point, and I agree, some events could be tweaked, but overall I think the engine provides pretty nice results.

I'm sure the BBs know it could be tweaked. Another much suggested item is to add block-events.
I'm sure some day they'll get to it and optimize it a bit, but I fear they have too much work they still should get to.

Any way, what I wanted to tell you was that even your thread was closed, the suggestion probably will make it trough. Thought that might be nice for you to know. ;)

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
34999.10 in reply to 34999.9
Date: 6/9/2008 4:20:20 PM
New York Jests
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
Thanks, that is nice to know. It is disheartening when your thread is closed without any responses. I figured it was read and passed on and no explanation was really necessary but a simple response is always helpful.

This Post:
00
34999.11 in reply to 34999.10
Date: 6/9/2008 4:32:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Thanks, that is nice to know. It is disheartening when your thread is closed without any responses. I figured it was read and passed on and no explanation was really necessary but a simple response is always helpful.


Actually, I think I closed it from what I can tell, and I didn't mean to.

Completely my fault and as usual, I suck.

Nothing sinister, just stupidity.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
34999.12 in reply to 34999.11
Date: 6/9/2008 4:38:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
hehe, I actually didn't go and check who closed it.

It was prety clear to me that such a suggestion is clear and it makes sence, so I thought it just didn't need any discussion. Therefor it wasn't that bad it was closed, since the point was made. The only thing bad was the feeling RamboVT was left with, but we fixed that right away, didn't we Rambo? ;)

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
34999.13 in reply to 34999.12
Date: 6/9/2008 8:03:16 PM
New York Jests
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
219219
Sure thing, no worries.

Advertisement