BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Crazy's Eye on fouling

Crazy's Eye on fouling

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
99675.3 in reply to 99675.2
Date: 7/1/2009 12:47:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I'm no scientist, but from your findings I'd say that the winning team fouls more often so it's a winning strategy to have a couple of bruisers on your squad.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
From: Mannen

This Post:
00
99675.4 in reply to 99675.2
Date: 7/1/2009 4:42:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7575
I could not open the file with my Excel 2003 so i downloaded some 2007 compability stuff from microsoft but i still cant open the file... Is it possible to get the next file in some other format?

/Mannen
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
99675.5 in reply to 99675.4
Date: 7/1/2009 4:47:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
http://www.filefactory.com/file/ahah0f3/n/Fouls_xls - it an pseudo excel(2007 so you need to parse too, but i don't know how good they understand the older files), but sad that MS can not implemt the simple standards ...

But maybe i was to optimistic in this case, till they understand html have take some years too.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 7/1/2009 4:48:31 PM

This Post:
00
99675.6 in reply to 99675.3
Date: 7/1/2009 4:55:12 PM
New York Chunks
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
943943
I think the sample size needs to be bigger...

It's funny, I was just about to argue on this, but I checked my regular season games for this season and found that in 8 games, the winning team had more fouls 4 times, the losing team 3 times, and teams equal fouls once. However, I did notice that in the one game with a huge difference in number of fouls, the winning team won.

A few things to consider:

- When a team is losing in the final minute or two, that team fouls a lot (and probably still loses, adding to the "loser's foul count")

- Perhaps fouling is a good strategy when the opposition shoots free throws poorly. A study on fouls should distinguish between the more competitive leagues and lower leagues, assuming that older teams have more developed players who shoot free throws better, and fouling may lead more often to losing. On the other hand, more advanced teams may have better depth, so getting into foul trouble is less of an issue for those teams and fouling is less likely to lead to a loss than for newer teams with poor depth.

- How often does a foul lead to an injury? Something to ponder that may make fouling affective...

Don't ask what sort of Chunks they are, you probably don't want to know. Blowing Chunks since Season 4!
Message deleted
This Post:
00
99675.8 in reply to 99675.3
Date: 7/1/2009 4:57:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
I'm no scientist, but from your findings I'd say that the winning team fouls more often so it's a winning strategy to have a couple of bruisers on your squad.


Have a look about my matches and you won't say that :)

This Post:
00
99675.9 in reply to 99675.2
Date: 7/1/2009 5:01:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
From my experience, one thing you should take account is the shooting fouls %

If a team make 20 fouls but just 10 are shooting it is not the same if 15 of 20 are shooting fouls. You will found quickly that loosing teams have high shooting fouls %...

This Post:
00
99675.10 in reply to 99675.9
Date: 7/2/2009 3:52:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
maybe someone can examine that later, but on a first look over my and the games there the free throws see to fit to the number of fouls for both teams.

maybe this appears to you, because of the end game logic of tight matches

This Post:
00
99675.11 in reply to 99675.10
Date: 7/2/2009 1:59:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
I have recently seen the suggestion that high driving skills may force more fouls. Not sure if this is true; however, someone said that they draw more fouls when their opponent "backs off slightly". Could this be an allusion to a player making a good drive so the opponent had to back off, allowing a perimeter shot?

On an inside shot, a drive is usually pretty obvious, with the text saying something like "player x drives to the basket".

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
99675.12 in reply to 99675.11
Date: 7/2/2009 2:51:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I have recently seen the suggestion that high driving skills may force more fouls.


i believe that it in in better player get more fouls against weaker one, without knowing the skills of both players it is hard to test - maybe when it comes to an evidence in this study you could take another viw on it.

On an inside shot, a drive is usually pretty obvious, with the text saying something like "player x drives to the basket".


Won't say that, i could be just a text for a shot near the basket - and i also don't have fun to watch all games ;)

someone said that they draw more fouls when their opponent "backs off slightly".


also here i don't like to watch all the games, maybe it is a text for missed shot + foul when it gives something like that.

This Post:
00
99675.13 in reply to 99675.12
Date: 7/2/2009 3:11:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
You could be right on all points except this one:

also here i don't like to watch all the games, maybe it is a text for missed shot + foul when it gives something like that.


I have seen shots go in when a player "backs off slightly". I have also seen missed shots on this text without a foul. Anyhow, it doesn't mean anything.

In any case, I personally would prefer a game engine that is "no nonsense". What I mean by that is every phrase means something in terms of what skills are used. Otherwise it is all fluff and no substance.

If this game engine is a "nonsense" version, I'd rather just see: "player X scores" and forget all the fluff.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
Advertisement