all non-athletic PG had little succes early in their carreers.
Nash is not as good a defender as rubio is, nor is he as athletic. He bases his play in the pick and roll, if you go around the defense he will take and make the shot, if you fight the screen he will attack the rim luring the defence to hit the open man or finding the screener be it rolling to the rim (warrick) or poping to shoot (frye) (stoudamire could do both). Nash is also a very good finisher around the rim, goes to peoples bodies and is very very crafty.
I think love is an ideal partner for this, he can roll to the rim and finish or he could pop out and wait to shoot the 3. Also he has a very good IQ, and very good spacing.B easley could also play pic and roll or pick and pop but he just doesnt have a good IQ and wouldnt recognize when to pop and when to roll.
Then again the problem is rubio, he needs to be consistent at least in his mid range jumpshot and he needs to be able to finish at the rim with both hands. If not defenders will simply go under the screen letting him shoot, and luring him to the rim for the easy block.
Cassel wasnt a very good long range shooter, but made his pic and roll after an isolation and close to the rim. That is one solution to range problem. Also you see Parker who is not a good jumpshooter excel with floters. Rubio needs to master something to get him going. Nash or CP3 crafty finishing around the rim, a consistent midrange game or a good floater. And you see every succesful pic and roll player being good at more than one of those. (or just mind blowingly athletic, as rose or westbrook were in his first season)
In the defensive end rubio is not very ahtletic, but he is very long. He is also quite tall, so if he can buckle up i can see him staying in front of players, maybe he can have trouble with very explosive players like rose, but others that use dribble penetration might have problems with his long arms and fast hands. (and he will have to stop gambling)
He also has a very hi IQ. Long arms hi IQ reminds me of stockton, but he is not even near as tough as Stockton was. and sneaking inside the paint just with craftyness will get you hurt (you see it constantly with CP3 or nash, remember when he broke his nose and put it in place himself?)
Edit: I would love to see him be extremely succesfull, he has the potential to be one of the best. He has the work ethic to improve his outside shot, he has the talent and craftyness to improve his finishing around the rim. He can take advices, he has a great IQ. My only concern would be toughness, both to fisical play and to mental stress. You can not teach that, and he is not there. I think that, and patience, will be the key to his success.
Last edited by Flamen at 8/1/2011 10:19:33 AM