BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Motion vs. 3-2

Motion vs. 3-2

Set priority
Show messages by
From: strilfe

This Post:
00
197095.30 in reply to 197095.27
Date: 9/28/2011 9:34:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
Honestly? I analyze more based on stats, rating and results than offensive tactics of my rivals. For the record, my Skeletor comment wasn't very serious. =)

I'd go with m2m and select the defenders according to the matchup -even switching positions-, mainly because most of the teams I faced are outside attackers, especially the top teams, who happen to have post players that are more rebounders than scorers. The moment I face any opponent that attack inside more than 3 games a year, I´ll let you know... And probably seek your advice!!

About motion, 3-2 should do the trick... except when you face teams that (guess) have post players who happen to be great rebounders. That's a huge advantage to give away.

From: ClipCap

This Post:
00
197095.31 in reply to 197095.29
Date: 9/28/2011 10:03:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
Salaries are lower, but price to buy, the good ones at least, much much higher

Right is not a popularity contest!
This Post:
00
197095.32 in reply to 197095.31
Date: 9/29/2011 1:28:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
I would still prefer playing m2m against either motion or LI.

This Post:
00
197095.33 in reply to 197095.32
Date: 9/29/2011 10:35:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
Against LI I agree, but if I can count on Motion or RnG I'd go 3-2 zone, as long as I had the Rebounding covered against my opponent.

Right is not a popularity contest!