BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Financial Fair Play

Financial Fair Play

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
197980.30 in reply to 197980.29
Date: 10/10/2011 11:44:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
127127
I also love the idea! On the other hand, when you think you'll have to pay him 2 weeks before he can eventually help your team out, that sounds a little bit harsch.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
197980.31 in reply to 197980.29
Date: 10/10/2011 11:45:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
I still think some kind of deadline would be a much better option. The problem is not the first rounds of the cup (where the teams are still building) it's the odd, sign players now and win the cup.

From: GM-hrudey

This Post:
00
197980.32 in reply to 197980.31
Date: 10/10/2011 12:39:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I still think some kind of deadline would be a much better option. The problem is not the first rounds of the cup (where the teams are still building) it's the odd, sign players now and win the cup.


I think personally that if there was some mechanism that actually required teams to be just that -- teams that remain relatively consistent from year to year, with upgrades and new trainees, rather than a collection of mercenaries put together at whatever time needed to win league/cup/b3 matches, it would be on the whole far better. The specific problem you're referencing of course could be fixed with a deadline and if that is the only thing one is concerned about, that seems like a wholly natural solution. I just like other direction myself.

From: ezlife
This Post:
11
197980.34 in reply to 197980.30
Date: 10/16/2011 7:41:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
127127
Very interesting article from NY-Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/12/sports/basketball/owner...

So, salary cap or luxury tax? As far as I know, none of these are used in BB. This has to change!

Last edited by ezlife at 10/16/2011 7:57:43 AM

From: WFUnDina

This Post:
00
197980.35 in reply to 197980.34
Date: 10/16/2011 7:56:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
I plused 1 that.

That was a darn good read!

From: B.B.King

This Post:
00
197980.37 in reply to 197980.34
Date: 10/16/2011 8:09:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
As far as I know, none of these are used in BB.

In BB we have luxury tax. It's hidden but it exists. Formula of salary isn't linear and it works practically in the same way as luxury tax. If player has 3 primary skills higher by one level then his salary increases to 150% and it's huge difference.

From: Izaman
This Post:
00
197980.38 in reply to 197980.37
Date: 10/26/2011 8:51:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
131131
To me, i think its simple.

Every league has TV money. You hire a player make more that 25% of the TV money, you should be force to sign that player to a contract of X weeks.

Every player you hire making more than that should require a contract of X+1 week.

you buy 5 players making more than the decided amount, you are force to keep them at least 4 weeks.

The game has got to limit roster moves and/or punish selling starters.

its downright too easy to sell integral players in this game.

Somebody let me a hold a no. 2 pencil cause they testin' me.
This Post:
11
197980.39 in reply to 197980.38
Date: 10/27/2011 8:57:58 AM
Kitakyushu
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
12341234
We already have a salary floor why not add a ceiling.?..make it 900K. If you go over it, for example..a team has a 950K roster..the 50K that he is over should be distributed to the other teams in the league.
I also think all the home grown talent's salary should be only counted as half. For example..you have a 120K PG from your country, only 60K would count against the ceiling. Very easy stuff...

Advertisement