BuzzerBeater Forums

I like the draft. It is a novelty and it is kind of fun. It just isn't practical. The cost to participate in the draft is an economic drain on a franchise, when typically there are only a couple of marginal talents in the draft. As far as I can tell, a very small percentage of teams even participate in the draft on a yearly basis. To thoroughly evaluate a class it can require upwards of 60 scouting points. If planned well, a team could acquire these points over 2 seasons for around 300k. That's quite a bit of cash for a middle of the pack team to fork over for leftovers. The top talent just goes to the tankers anyway.

Why not allot every team 20 points at the beginning of the season. These 20 scouting points would not carry over as the purchased ones do. You could continue to purchase at a slower pace and save for a season or two if it is in your franchises best interest, but by allotting 20 scouting points to each franchise to start, I think it would encourage more users to participate in the draft. I am totally fine with the number and randomness of the great players coming out of the draft, but the search and Monday morning scouting is always pretty fun.

I understand some will say "just change the cost structure of the scouting points", but the point would be, use em or lose em. I think it would encourage more owners to spend some cash on the draft and explore an aspect of this game that has generally been ignored by a majority of the owners. I don't think the draft needs a total revamp, just some stimulus to encourage participation.

* - By encouraging owners to participate in the draft, it also makes it a little more unlikely tankers get the second or third best prospect in the draft with the top pick in the second round. I believe generally, people do not engage in the draft so there is a moderate chance a tanker gets the top choice, and then gets a prospect that he can sell to recoup some of the cash he spent on obtaining the top talent.

Last edited by Yuck at 12/04/2012 11:28:52

I like the new rules for 5th place, but can you explain the rational behind the 50-50 split in gate revenue for all playoff games. The way I see it, all teams will lose money in the playoffs because you have to spend close to your maximum revenue to make the playoffs in competitive leagues.

The playoffs should be financially rewarding for all. Why not add a bonus to all play off teams to ensure this?

Thanks!

Teams only pay salary when the team plays a competitive match during that week. The first playoff round starts on Tuesday, the second round (conference finals) are played on Saturday. This means that independent of winning the 1st round, playoff teams will have to pay full salary during the first playoff week. As #3 or #4 seeds often lose the first round, many perceived finishing in these positions as being less financially rewarding than not playing playoffs at all (5th), despite long term effects on the fan survey.

In the new system seed #1 will expect to earn about 25% less gate receipts. If #2 or #3 play 1 home and 1 away match they will expect the earn the same amount as in the old system, while #2 earns 25% less if they lose the first match. The #3 and #4 will both expect a 50% increase in gate receipts for both 1 and 2 away matches - assuming about equal arenas income in all scenarios. So, in the new system mainly the #1 is worse off (and in 1 scenario #2), all other teams will either profit or earn the same due to the change.

During the regular season teams usually receive gate receipts once per week, i.e. 100% of the expected revenue. During this first playoff week, again the #1 ranked team will still receive 100% arena revenue if the team wins the 1st match (as compared to 133% in the old system).
We believe the rewards for finishing #1 (and in lesser effect also #2), such as having a higher chance of winning playoff matches due to home court advantage and thus higher title chances, higher promotion chances and a higher chance of playing the second playoff week which gives another week of gate receipts are substantial already.

So in short, we agree with your statement that playoffs should be rewarding for all and since the new system takes a little of the profit of #1 and distributes it to the #3 and #4 so that their risked loss of playing playoffs decreases, we believe that the new system is actually much more in line with your statement than the old one.

I believe this also answers to some other people in this topic that raised about the same question,

Regards,

For me the biggest concerns right now are the depleting number of users and the feeling that there really is no one behind this game and marin is overworked.

I entered the game after some publicity seen on a NBA website, are you going to repeat those publicity campaigns?

BB-Marin gave on suggestions a hint on why the boxscores are late and that some new things could be tried. Is this one of your priorities? It would be nice to keep us updated just to let us know that there is someone behind the game.

We try to manage our advertising budget as effectively as possible. If expensive ads such as the ones on the NBA site are expected to give the required returns we won’t hesitate to advertise on NBA again. Unfortunately the NBA ads ended up being very expensive, and brought in few users per dollar spent compared to other sources. We continually look for new advertising opportunities and are currently advertising on many sites, typically through Google Adwords.

We have tried some chances to the boxscore processing before, some with more success than others and Marin will certainly continue to try optimizing this process. We prioritize the actual simulation of games above the creation of boxscores to limit the game delays, and as a tradeoff we often have to push back the processing of boxscores at our peak hours to not delay upcoming games. We know this is one of the most mentioned problems by the community, and therefore we can assure you we continuously look for solutions, by due to the complex nature of this process it’s hard to keep updating everyone about the made progress.

Finally, most of the concerns you raised about the BB staff have been explained in season 19’s newsitem. Not much has changed ever since, Marin is still doing a tremendous job as our head developer, the founders Charles, Mark and Forrest have careers and jobs outside of BuzzerBeater that effectively prevent them from putting long or regular hours into the game and Edju and I are no programmers ;).

Raymund helps out on small tasks and is a backup person in case of emergencies. If for example Mark and Marin are unavailable in case of an emergency Raymund steps in to help restart processes that crashed.

In any league in the world the championship winner is decided and then play an extra game?
What is the point? Not competitive, chance of injury, etc.

(231617.1)
Well, 38 managers have voted and 34 of them want to see a buying deadline for the cup......so maybe next season it could be up for a change.
BTW...Thanks for your time answering questions...