BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Promotion or not !

Promotion or not !

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
41429.30 in reply to 41429.29
Date: 8/6/2008 4:38:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
387387
Hey, starting in Season 3, I've only just got to the point where I can spend the excess on players rather than more seats!!! (well, I thought I had, then the Players Union started demanding Club Yachts for every player).

Talk to Inebriated, he's the EBBL champ with the 20k arena...

This Post:
00
41429.31 in reply to 41429.19
Date: 8/6/2008 5:28:44 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
I would expect you to earn considerably more in DI than in DII, because the fans are much more interested in buying tickets.

This only holds if his area is big enough. Mine, for example, has been designed to be full at max prices in DII (which, one may argue, has been optimal up to now). So I am lucky I have some spare cash to extend it a bit, otherwise the only benefit I get from promotion is a 40% tax instead of a 25% tax...


this is a managerial game so one must choose how many risks it's worth taking
keeping a small arena with maxed prices and using the money another manager spends on seats to buy better players means giving up some flexibility. if you start losing some matches the attendance will go down much faster

(of course there was no way to foresee a change of this magnitude and i think it should have been announced some week in advance to give managers at least the time to adapt)

This Post:
00
41429.32 in reply to 41429.31
Date: 8/6/2008 6:29:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
I would expect you to earn considerably more in DI than in DII, because the fans are much more interested in buying tickets.

This only holds if his area is big enough. Mine, for example, has been designed to be full at max prices in DII (which, one may argue, has been optimal up to now). So I am lucky I have some spare cash to extend it a bit, otherwise the only benefit I get from promotion is a 40% tax instead of a 25% tax...


this is a managerial game so one must choose how many risks it's worth taking
keeping a small arena with maxed prices and using the money another manager spends on seats to buy better players means giving up some flexibility. if you start losing some matches the attendance will go down much faster

(of course there was no way to foresee a change of this magnitude and i think it should have been announced some week in advance to give managers at least the time to adapt)

Right. So 'unforeseen and lopsided changed by the game administrators' should have been in my book of risks. Hindsight is 20/20, I imagine.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
41429.33 in reply to 41429.26
Date: 8/6/2008 7:42:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
Theoretically, this is true. Practically, one seat is immaterial.


Oh yeah, then check out my stadium. 5771/5772. The one empty seat is a luxury box. 817 dollars isn't immaterial to me.

I think the guys here new this was going to be a b*tch, but it had to be done. There's enough complaining when I'm at work, or when I'm in line somewhere. I'm on this site to alleviate the amount of whiny ****s I come in contact with.

If you're a good manager, you'll adapt and overcome.

Message deleted