PS for crazy-eye: I don't realy see your point, but to answer this question of yours, what happens if you build 100/1000 and then 50/500, would it look diffrent? no it wouldn't, in each case, wheter you build one or the other, or even both amounts, you end up with 50/500 as that's the limit...
if you plan with 100/1000 you have to invest lot more money there right? Staying a lot under the soft cap, is in my eyes economical not good. If you now have limited founds, it affects how many bleacher lower tie you build, because you have more/less money tp put in the cheap categories with the same target reaching the 20k fast.
Before the limit was introduced, you could plan with 100/1000 but land as a surprise at 50/500 but maybe already have the bleachers you would have build for the 100/1000 arena.
yes, I more or less see your point now. But if I do, I still don't see a big (negative) impact on the whole thing.
People who expanded past the 50/500 limit had tickets sold for those seats (I did, and if not there was no point in building them, unless the other type of seats wasn't sold out either, and then it again doesn't influence anything) When their number was turned back, they got the refunds which they then could use to expand other seats if wanted. In most cases people build all seats equivalently, or build the lower cost seats first. For them it has no negative impact at all.
For the few that might have build the expensive ones first (which isn't very smart either, but okay, maybe there are such people who did like to do it that way) you can argue they had a negative impact as they might have been waiting for the money they would get back to build the other type of seats, and that's called bad planning, as BB anounced the cap, and only after a period of time, executed the change.
BUT this has nothing to do with the question initially asked.
They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.