BuzzerBeater Forums

If you are getting rid of the blank lineup, you need to do something about high stamina players. It's very hard to manage minutes for GS for these players. I should be able to start a player twice in a week and not have to worry about him getting 75-80+ minutes and ruining his game shape. It basically punishing a guy for being in too good of athletic conditioning.

I have mever played BL in a real game.
I have played it once or twice in a PL.
I think that BL are the easy way out and
I want to win in this game through the work.
But, on the other hand, players should have different GS levels.

We will consider it, I know it's not ideal as it is.

The reason blank lineups work better is because "let coach decide" does a poor job of substituting players when you fill the depth chart. With a blank lineup, the coach constantly looks for the best lineup, leading to more substitutions and, presumably, a more rested group of players on the floor.

Blank lineups are not a way out, they are a way to permit you coach to make the most out of your team. For whatever reason, the coach makes more intelligent decisions in a blank lineup situation. Why you would want to get rid of the most intelligent coaching method is beyond me.

Last edited by Dmitri at 7/4/2014 9:46:51 AM

So, how does this works, exactly? I mean, we could use more details.

This is what I assume: You need to set your starting lineup, and you can leave substitutions blank with Let coach decide. For example, if you have 5 good starters and 2-3 extra good players. This is the way good teams are currently constructed. Will it work under the new game engine?

I will happily test the thing ... but ... do I put starters in and nothing else? Do I put 1, 2 or 3 players in and nothing else? Do I pick the 12 players and nothing else? Do I fill in starter, backup and reserve for one position and nothing else?

Is there an actual, comprehensive, REALISTIC* explanation of this matter anywhere? It would be useful to help shape the conversation constructively and help us know how to test it.

How it works now ____________________
Pros and cons ______________________
The proposed change _____________________
Pros and cons of the change ______________________

*Realistic and unbiased, not vigorously spun and one-sided like the discussion on permitting a manager to have a second team.

Thank you.

Last edited by Mike Franks at 7/4/2014 12:30:01 PM

*Realistic and unbiased, not vigorously spun and one-sided like the discussion on permitting a manager to have a second team.

The problem is, that's not how the Internet works. ;)

Read BB-Marin, they had to stop it for this week because training was failing this morning.

It's no. 2. Walkovers are not affected by the change. This feature will only be used when none or just one starter is set. If the number of players dressed (in the roster) is lower than the walkover minimum, the game will still be a walkover.

This is surprising. I was convinced until yesterday that "Empty Lineup / Let Coach Decide" was an intentional feature, with a number of advantages:

- managers must trade- off optimum substitutions vs control over who plays at what position
- managers must trade-off optimum minutes in game vs better control over weekly minutes
- managers can study how the BB-code compares players - useful both for newcomers and for experts

What are the downsides?

- enables a casual managing style with empty lineup in all competitive games
- favours managers who skip the training dimension of the game

But are these real problems? Casual players are a significant - although silent - component of the user base. And training is not a competitive strategy, it is an alternative way of playing the game, which actually makes it more interesting in the long term. Those who claim that training and player development should be the optimum approach for short-term competitiveness cannot possibly be serious. Please look to the real world.

So in sum I do not agree at all that "Empty Lineup / Let Coach Decide" should be punished. This would make the game poorer.

From the Guide:
Substitution Pattern
The coach will sometimes use his own judgment to decide what the proper balance is between starters, backups, reserves, and even players on the bench but not in the depth chart at all. You can set the balance between how much coaches use their own judgment or defer to yours with the substitutions box. You can use entirely your judgment (Strictly Follow Depth Chart), entirely the coach's judgment (Let Coach Decide), a mix between the two (Coach Picks from Depth Chart), or you can use your depth chart strictly until the 4th quarter, then tell the coach to try and win the game however he thinks is best (Depth Chart until 4th).


No where does it say anything about blank lineups leading to the best rotation. This is not a newbie assist or casual assist. This only helps coaches that have learned the nuances of the game and that in fact know that blank lineups are ideal. I spent 8 seasons not knowing that BL was the ultimate strategy, until this season where I saw a former CUP WINNER having awesome rotations that I had never noticed before.

So no, this is just a powergamer strategy...not a normal user strategy. Maybe, you haven't spent enough time playing in low leagues?