BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > All-Star Votes?

All-Star Votes?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Jokehim
This Post:
00
66644.32 in reply to 66644.31
Date: 1/5/2009 2:57:41 PM
Jokehim Maniacs
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
190190
Second Team:
Jokehim Maniacs II
All-star team becomes very strange most of the time. My backup SG was voted in as reserve while my regular was not. None of the SG's and SF's are close to same level as mine in all-star team. But of course reason is that I alternate positions for my players to get best possible training. If I wanted to have optimal number of players in all-star team I would chose players for that purpose instead of training but there is no reason to do so.

By the way, in 3-point shotout 4 players from inactive team will participate of the 6 chosen. A rather strange thing to happen ...

From: Onski
This Post:
00
66644.33 in reply to 66644.32
Date: 1/6/2009 4:57:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
I just wanted to say I think that the mechanism for choosing the 3 point candidates and all stars is more than fair. Mainly cause my team Onski Mooses (38823) that is average (8-5 record) managed to get 4 players in the 3 point shootout. And three of those players are starting in the all-star game. So yeah the mechanism is awesome.

Just a query, does any team have more players than 4 in the 3 point contest and 3 starters in the all-star game? Or is it just me. Please note I am only gloating as I have had a frustrating season and its about time something went right for me. :P

From: Astragoth

This Post:
00
66644.34 in reply to 66644.33
Date: 1/6/2009 5:11:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
lol... i am totally shocked by the fairness and logic behind the all star voting system...

ps i tried to sound more sarcastic than you... did it work? :)

This Post:
00
66644.35 in reply to 66644.34
Date: 1/6/2009 6:31:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
No it didn't. You just sounded bitter and low. (lame smiley thing of your choice here )

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
66644.36 in reply to 66644.35
Date: 1/6/2009 6:34:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
i am very bitter. can you imagine not a single player off mine made the starting 5 all star spots. I have sleeples night, am crying all day long and wondering if the hoop is high enough to stick my head in upset down and always hide there :)

Last edited by Astragoth at 1/6/2009 6:34:55 AM

This Post:
00
66644.37 in reply to 66644.36
Date: 1/6/2009 6:54:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
I have no starters either. I feel your pain except that none of my players deserve to be starting unlike Cipriano. Maybe he'll be the game's MVP.

I loved the Moomins when I was a kid.







Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
From: Thijs

This Post:
00
66644.38 in reply to 66644.33
Date: 1/6/2009 7:53:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9292
In our game all starters come from only 4 owners...

This Post:
00
66644.39 in reply to 66644.32
Date: 1/6/2009 8:45:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
this is the real problema of the actual ASG...my conference had a center who had a salry who is 1/10 of his correspective of the other conference...

This Post:
00
66644.40 in reply to 66644.39
Date: 1/6/2009 8:56:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
sorry but salary is once again only an indication for how good a player is and not a clear fact... People should stop looking at "player salaries", "team ratings", "player ratings" and so many other information as it is as holy as what is written in the bible.

Two reasons why player salaries are a poor indicator as to how good the player really is. Someone with 1 very high skill and low other skills earns (alot) more than a more balanced player when it comes to skills. Secondly, salaries for players are only updated once a season. We are half way through this season and a player that was fully trained the first half off the season and had a salary off $5000 at the start might be better now than a player with a starting salary off $10000 at season start and wasn't trained at all...

In case I am wrong, please someone speak up. :) (have this opinion not from the rules, but using my knowledge and from what I have read on the forums)

This Post:
00
66644.41 in reply to 66644.40
Date: 1/6/2009 9:01:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I know all the things you have said,and i agree with that,but if the center of my conference is 34 years ago and have 5100$of salary and the other confernce center is 22 years ago and have 55000$ of salary,is very probably that in my conference team rotate players in postion of centers to have a better training,so my opinion is that often good players doesn't play at the all star game

This Post:
00
66644.42 in reply to 66644.41
Date: 1/6/2009 9:07:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
I know all the things you have said,and i agree with that,but if the center of my conference is 34 years ago and have 5100$of salary and the other confernce center is 22 years ago and have 55000$ of salary,is very probably that in my conference team rotate players in postion of centers to have a better training,so my opinion is that often good players doesn't play at the all star game

yes, about 10 people already pointed out that played minutes/games seems to be the biggest reason why players get voted for the all star team... so what you are saying above many people will agree with you, but is something different imo than what you said in your other postl...

Advertisement