BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Changes in Season 10

Changes in Season 10

Set priority
Show messages by
From: brian

This Post:
00
93604.321 in reply to 93604.320
Date: 7/25/2009 10:41:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
576576
Their PG and SG went off and based on the PG/SG you fielded that seems about right considering your backcourt was so much weaker in salary and rating.

Personally, I'd love to see that the new GE provided more balance and to give outside teams a chance. The old engine was built for inside teams only.

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
This Post:
00
93604.322 in reply to 93604.309
Date: 7/26/2009 12:16:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Your OD was respectable medium and his perimeter scoring was proficient low. His PG was 10-15 against the small forward you had playing PG. The rest of is team went 4-13. What is your SF's OD?

Last edited by somdetsfinest at 7/26/2009 12:20:53 AM

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
93604.323 in reply to 93604.322
Date: 7/26/2009 4:25:43 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Please could you explain me why my SF was defending against his PG? The defence is not the sum of the OD of play, guard and SF? Also to be honest it was strange too the % of my PF...
Please let me know this is an interesting point for me, and thanks in advance ;)

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: kaprons

To: ned
This Post:
00
93604.324 in reply to 93604.323
Date: 7/26/2009 6:05:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1616
as i understand then now game is more dynamic and realistic in gameplay (i dont know if in stats they are correctly). that means that not always your PG will be guarded by opponents PG. in real games players go to help one another sometimes, there are switching and so on.

From: Marot

To: ned
This Post:
00
93604.325 in reply to 93604.323
Date: 7/26/2009 7:35:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Its what i said before, if you use a zone your SF will defend sometimes the PG or the SG or SF with 3-2, thats explained on the news and on some posts of the BB. If for example you will be playing looking inside next games and u use a PF as a SF for example and he hasnt a good OD its better to use a defense man to man so he will only defend his SF(against R&G teams), its ''only an example''.

Last edited by Marot at 7/26/2009 7:36:25 AM

From: Foto

To: ned
This Post:
00
93604.326 in reply to 93604.323
Date: 7/26/2009 7:37:11 AM
Totwart
ACBB
Overall Posts Rated:
31573157
Second Team:
Furabolos
Please could you explain me why my SF was defending against his PG?


I don't see the problem with that. What did you expect defending in zone with the new engine? Now a zone is a zone, so this will happen very often

From: ned

To: Foto
This Post:
00
93604.327 in reply to 93604.326
Date: 7/26/2009 7:49:17 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Please could you explain me why my SF was defending against his PG?


I don't see the problem with that. What did you expect defending in zone with the new engine? Now a zone is a zone, so this will happen very often


Is not difficult to understand my point of view. I had play and guard with more than lvl 10 in OD and only the SF with lower OD. It means that all the 3 points shot taken by his PG were against my SF? If so I had bad luck. At the end it seems better to defend man by man instead of make the right choice.

Thanks anyway for the explaination, it is really strange to understand why my SF decided to defend always again his PG and honestly it is also really strange to understand why Mazzurana scored with more than 50% against an NT Indonesian player and against an U21 Italian NT player (and if you wanna consider also the SF, against a player sold for 5m).

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: Foto

To: ned
This Post:
00
93604.328 in reply to 93604.327
Date: 7/26/2009 8:03:04 AM
Totwart
ACBB
Overall Posts Rated:
31573157
Second Team:
Furabolos
It's no easy to say something without knowing the skills of the players. That's why I try to be prudent about games of teams I don't know.

So what I can't say about my own games is that this time, the engine is much better than the first version, at least playing 2/3 zone and man to man. It's the first game, so we have to see how all the posibilities works.

I'm sure there are a lot of games with the old engine that made you cracy (who don't, xd), so let's wait to see if we can get use to it. I'm sure there are people who dislikes this new engine who would love it in the future and, on the contrary, people who thinks today that it's much better, would miss the old one if they lose a couple of games.

From: BB-Forrest

To: ned
This Post:
00
93604.329 in reply to 93604.327
Date: 7/26/2009 8:07:44 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
One thing to keep in mind in a zone is that players aren't stupid and aren't going to take well gaurded shots so just as in m2m you see your weaker defenders defend more shots, in a zone you will see weaker defenders/areas exploited. A zone will work well for you if it hides your weaknesses and your opponent is not equipped either tactically or personell wise to take advantage

This Post:
00
93604.330 in reply to 93604.323
Date: 7/26/2009 8:39:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Sorry for the vague explanation. What I meant was that your PG for the game, Pacifici, is listed as a small forward. Because of this I assumed his OD would be slightly lower than a traditional PG. I didn't watch your game, so I don't know who he scored against, but their PG had a great game. He went for 50. What are you gonna do?

And as far as your SF for the game, Marchignoli, you gotta expect a player of Lamache's quality to be looking to take it to an 18 year old with a salary of $4150 a week. Especially in a 3-2 zone where he is responsible for guarding a wing by himself.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
Advertisement