BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Economy

Economy (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
152075.325 in reply to 152075.323
Date: 8/18/2010 5:12:52 PM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12021202
Second Team:
Jirkov
I wrote different incomes in different league levels. It's caused mainly by attendance. There should be difference, but it's too high in my eyes now. And maybe there should be no difference since some level - maybe III or IV and down.

This Post:
00
152075.326 in reply to 152075.325
Date: 8/18/2010 5:28:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
288288
My bad!

Mmmh, i don't really know if agree or disagree. I think it's right that different leagues have different incomes... about the "how much difference", i don't know.... I have only played in V and IV league so i only have seen the difference between those two.
I'll see what people, that have played more different leagues, have to say...

This Post:
00
152075.328 in reply to 152075.295
Date: 8/18/2010 6:40:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Everything I see here written suggests that noone can promote in Italy/Spain IV or V division. I think we have established the fact that the best still promote.
Also I have seen said that every team operates at -0 or -(insert any number here) weekly balance. This seems illogical, why?, because we would have 15 teams per every league going bankrupt every season. Is it happening? No!
I know I'm from a lesser league and I have to avoid big projects on buying players, but it's about a couple of weeks now that I'm looking for a player that can be useful as SF. I know Ill'never be able to buy someone as good as I would like. I need just someone suitable for a IV league here in Italy.
Well, you know? I didn't buy anyone because each player I could afford was too weak, and each player who had the minimum skills to play decently was too high in price, due to all the small nations managers (who can afford to buy even overpriced players) making prices rise.
You have looked for a SF about 2 weeks now? I looked for a SF I could buy for almost 6 months before I found one I could afford and was not a marginal upgrade at the spot. Even then I settled for a bit unevenly trained player (that I now have to fix with training). So my advice to you is to stop looking for players you can sell for profit later and start buying players that you plan to train and keep.
I wish I could say I have never been outbid on a player by a Italian div IV/V team (both actually). Perhaps when you get outbid every time you set your bar too high and are hoping to get players your checkbook could never afford.

This Post:
00
152075.330 in reply to 152075.308
Date: 8/19/2010 2:25:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5656
It's like I said before in this thread.

TheMaxx, you don't have money because your arena doesn't give you much money. In your last game you had like 134k. You pay almost 200k just in players salaries. You can't expect to have a lot of money if every week you gain 134k in the arena.

And please, tell me, if I can't win enough because I can't afford decent players, how I am supposed to make people come to the arena? Where do I go to hire lap dancers?

This Post:
00
152075.331 in reply to 152075.311
Date: 8/19/2010 2:27:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5656
,that can have more money to buy players on the SAME MARKET in which TheMaxx had to buy the players
I think my thought is clear enough...


Yes, it is. But it's reality. Every team has his own conditions and has to manage the team in these conditions as well as possible. That's all.

You know, it's easy to say "that's how it is. Cope with it" when you are on the good side of the gun.

This Post:
00
152075.332 in reply to 152075.316
Date: 8/19/2010 2:30:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5656
However i want to meet you at half the way... let's say, reductio ad absurdum, that the situation is fair because i meet teams in the same condition:
But why the economy isn't structured in the more logical and realistic way? If a country starts a division of basketball, it doesn't start with the incomes of a "big country" first division... it should start with the incomes of the "biggest country" lowerest division. Please give me your opinion this last thing.

You can design new game this way. But now it would caused big mismatch on BB.

Why you say that? Every team in the new country will have to compete with teams on the same level. It's just like it is now in Itally...

From: Shawnas
This Post:
00
152075.333 in reply to 152075.320
Date: 8/19/2010 2:30:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
i think that "unfair" is a poor choice of word for describing the problem of unbalanced economies
i'd rather complain about it saying it's "something that makes the game less fun for a big chunk of users"


I think its the best sentense int this thread.

As I think is a bit absurd, that big country should get something super duper extra above smaller country. but on the other hand it gets pretty boring, when your team stops and there is little room for improvement. and I think this game is about improving your team and ofc good managers are prefered, but lets get realistic - we all have lives and a game that takes 2-3 years and constantly sitting online scaning transfers list just to find little improvement in my opinion is doomed. if you can afford that, I would recommend you do some reasearch on poker or play WOW. BB has one huge advantage above HT is very dynamic training and promotion system. and thats a good thing, but this deflation makes game a little static. which is a bit sad and boring at same time. stagnation kills enthusiasm!

This Post:
00
152075.334 in reply to 152075.328
Date: 8/19/2010 2:46:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5656
Every season there are promotions and relegations, and, you know, a big part of the teams relegated from, let's say, III are the sema teams that were promoted from IV at the end of the previous season.
Guess why? Because to get promoted I have to almost drain my bank account (I'll repeat, maybe this time somebody will understand) because competition is high so you need a richer roster, and incomes are just enough to avoid bankrupcy, so next season I will not have enough money to make the changes to the roster that would permit me to avoid relegation.

By the way, I don't operate at "-(insert number here)", thanks to the "promotion bonus" also, I can operate with an income. More or less 25k per week.

Finally, about how long we looked for a SF: you know why I looked only for 2 weeks? Because after that period I realised I was not going to afford an even decent player for that role and I have decided to stop trying to get promoted (because I don't want to be relegated one season later) and find a way to survive next season without the "promotion bonus". If I'll make it, then I'll try again to get promoted. If I can't, well, I'll start play Monopoly. You know, in Monopoly you have to look only at the market, without a basketball league to distract you.

This Post:
00
152075.335 in reply to 152075.333
Date: 8/19/2010 2:50:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5656
this game is about improving your team and ofc good managers are prefered, but lets get realistic - we all have lives and a game that takes 2-3 years and constantly sitting online scaning transfers list just to find little improvement in my opinion is doomed. if you can afford that, I would recommend you do some reasearch on poker or play WOW. BB has one huge advantage above HT is very dynamic training and promotion system. and thats a good thing, but this deflation makes game a little static. which is a bit sad and boring at same time. stagnation kills enthusiasm!


I bet somebody will answer to your post saying "well, but all the teams in the same league are in the same conditions. Cope with it."

Me, I think you're right. If I want to play a game of almost pure trading, I play Monopoly.

Advertisement