That's also why they say that it gives managers "better control of their training minutes each week" than "gives them control"
Seriously, no. That paragraph read together with the previous one can only be interpreted as:
1) SFDC uses entirely the manager's choices (i.e. it should never stray from the depth chart set except when all the players in the depth chart are no longer able to play due to injury, ejection or fouling out).
You can use entirely your judgment (Strictly Follow Depth Chart)
2) you need to get at least 48 minutes to get full training
In order to train effectively, a player should get at least 48 minutes of game time in a given week
3) SFDC is the best at getting training because you prevent the coach from overruling the manager's decisions, which can be assumed from point 1 to be
within the depth chart decided by the manager. This means that in SFDC no player set as backup will ever start a game (as it happens with other options) and that he will have starter minutes and not scraps (I've seen 11-37 splits between starter and backup with other options)
in order to optimize your training minutes, you can use the Strictly Follow Depth Chart tactic to overrule some of the coach's substitution decisions
What happened in this game with the substitution of the starting PG with the backup PF due to a FT is something that should not happen in SFDC because of all the clear explanations from the Game Manual:
http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/81853163/reportmatch.as...Last edited by Lemonshine at 3/31/2015 6:30:11 AM