BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Supporter

Supporter

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
186066.34 in reply to 186066.33
Date: 5/31/2011 10:22:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
Because of goods having a market value in an economy system.

This is not meant to be a price-on-appliance. You only have to take a look around to see that in certain markets the supporter package is so overpriced that there´s no demand (for that price).

All we´re suggesting is an adjustment of the price to the market to balance supply and demand. We´re not talking about makein supportership so cheap virtually everyone can / will buy it.

If you can get a Boeing 747 for the price of a Matchbox Car, you go by your own need and buy a plane if you want to fly and a matchbox car if you want to play with it. If the Matchbox Car has the price of a Boeing 747, you wouldnt consider buying it no matter if you "want" it or not.

Let the market balance the price. That´s all. And make a "market" by putting compareable regions in the same "pot".

Last edited by LA-seelenjaeger at 5/31/2011 10:23:37 PM

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
This Post:
00
186066.37 in reply to 186066.36
Date: 6/1/2011 8:36:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14581458
Do you know BBs minds about my idea?

This Post:
00
186066.38 in reply to 186066.37
Date: 6/1/2011 9:09:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Do you know BBs minds about my idea?


they usually don't communicate it, but there was a some seasons ago where they had a question in that direction - so they obviously though about it in the past(but they doesn't realisiied it but don't ask me for reason why^^).

This Post:
00
186066.39 in reply to 186066.38
Date: 6/1/2011 9:29:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14581458
I see. Then we'll be without supporters. Anyway they are losing money ;)

This Post:
00
186066.40 in reply to 186066.39
Date: 6/1/2011 1:56:08 PM
From: Mr Angell

This Post:
11
186066.41 in reply to 186066.36
Date: 6/1/2011 1:57:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3939
No, my arguement still stands. Your argument is still based on supply and demand, not what an individual earns.. Please read what I said correctly before you try and flame me.

Regardless, if I have to pay $40 for supporter, and someone who lives in a desert/on a glacier/or even in feckin space only has to pay $20 and gets the exact same things I do, I'm not gonna be paying, and like I said before, I'm sure alot of other people feel the same whether they publicly say it or not.

I can accept failure, everyone fails at something. But I cant accept not trying. - MJ
This Post:
00
186066.42 in reply to 186066.40
Date: 6/1/2011 2:04:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14581458
Very interesting but.. I'm not economist

This Post:
00
186066.44 in reply to 186066.42
Date: 6/1/2011 2:12:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
293293
Me neither, but this comes up a lot in antitrust law This is basically what everyone is suggesting - perfect price discrimination would get everyone to buy supporter and allow the BBs to maximize their profits. Sadly, not as easy as it sounds.

Advertisement