BuzzerBeater Forums

The difference in TV revenue, the fact that small countries cup tournaments finish close to ASW, the smaller pool of NT talent to soften your merch revenue..... the smaller nations that wish to compete in the BB3 have to take a run at it using old resources as it's harder to sustain a $1mil roster all through the season unlike teams from big countries.....

Yes, cup tournaments finish earlier, but you can win it easely (only a few teams can compete) or at least arrive till the semi-finals/finals.
Yes, there's a smaller pool of NT/JNT players... that means you can have two/three of them simply training draftees or buying them spending a little money.
Additionally, as you join the game you are in II or even first league (with all the privileges), in Italy as you join the game you are in V if you're lucky, sometimes even in VI...

No, it's really not the beauty of the system. The beauty of the system would be if B3 can win the best manager no matter where he is from. And that's not the case of this season if VS wins the final.

We are not talking about 1M roster, but about 1,5M-2M roster and it's probably easier to sustain for 2 seasons in small country if team tanks enough before.

For me, a good manager can be in top BBB teams every season and every season be a contender to win both home trophies. You are a good example of that. If there is occasionaly a team like VS that comes along, let it be. It's not like this will happen every season. You have to have a lot of patience to tank enough seasons for being a "king" for just one season. For some it's worth it, but probably not many, so I guess a case like VS will come around once in 6-8 seasons. No biggie.

It's not like winning BBB means that team's manager is the best manager in BB universe. Mostly it's true, but not always.

Do you remember World Cup in South Corea and Japan? South Corea won against Span and Italy in knockout rounds. Isn't this a bit similar to VS winning this season? This doesn't mean Italy or Spain is a worse team than South Corea...it just means there were other factors working for S.Corea. Luckily we don't have "other factors" like these in BB. The closest would be injuries.

Last edited by Koperboy at 7/14/2011 6:48:44 AM

Do you remember World Cup in South Corea and Japan? South Corea won against Span and Italy in knockout rounds.

I hope you're joking.
If you don't remember those matches (I really do) go and watch them again. The greatest shame ever in the last 30-years of soccer games.

EDIT: I've seen your reply. I don't think we can compare these things, because here the problem is economy, which can be fixed.

Last edited by Biffo (*DT Member) at 7/14/2011 7:05:04 AM

Very bad example , you don't remember how referees very very help Korea to beat this rivals? Referees on force gave Korea this wins.

Sorry if you didn't see it, but that was exactly my point. BC Hostivac's manager is better than VS's manager, but VS still won. S. Corea team is worse than Spain and Italy, but won. That was my point. And thank god it doesn't happen often.

Oh, and about that "factors" I was talking about: I meant referees.

+1! XD

BC Törööö forever!

Come On, counts only victory, even in BB.

I think that we have a lot of examples that we have two schools of being at the top in real life. One is having enormous budget like real madrid and Chelsea London or byy young, perspective players, cheaper like Arsenal London or PSV few years ago and make a team for years.

I think that Misagh has right in it and all of You like Superfly Guy, rwystyrk, or Our T-mac,

Banan, nobody help Misagh won those games, he has got only team that makes an advantage. World Cup, ok they help them a little, but they played very good soccer
rwystyrk, you are like Arsene Wenger, very good team for years :) esteem

And I think Misagh is the first manager who buys superstars for a win, adn many other managers do that, becouse they want to win like we all :)

regards


Last edited by aMORFIczny at 7/14/2011 7:19:56 AM

I can't agree with your arguments.

It's not like winning BBB means that team's manager is the best manager in BB universe. Mostly it's true, but not always.

Should be at least top100 and that's not the case of VS.

For me, a good manager can be in top BBB teams every season and every season be a contender to win both home trophies. You are a good example of that. If there is occasionaly a team like VS that comes along, let it be. It's not like this will happen every season. You have to have a lot of patience to tank enough seasons for being a "king" for just one season. For some it's worth it, but probably not many, so I guess a case like VS will come around once in 6-8 seasons. No biggie..

I think you are wrong in your expectation. VS is just first tanked team that used his money for B3 glory. Ve can probably expect that many other tanked teams start to use their money. And there are even more wealthier than VS and can build team and fight for B3 win several seasons in a row. So I expect starting from now (if there are no changes) once in 4-5 season will win non-tanking team.

But to understand me right. I enter this discussion just because of strange arguments of B.B.King comparing VS and previous winner. I have already presented my opinion and ideas before (like international league for small countries instead of domestic league).