BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The Great Micro-nation Debate

The Great Micro-nation Debate

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Mr.Banane

To: Phyr
This Post:
22
278268.35 in reply to 278268.34
Date: 4/9/2016 9:02:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
349349
Hello,

As Senegal U21 Coach, I am not favor of consolidation project .

In IRL , nations do not combine to block the bigs. I don't see why it will happen on BB .

Coming in Senegal, I'm not pretended to beat China or another big nation. For me, this is what is interesting in a nation like Senegal .

Everything is to be done, and we have a great project .


I think it's important for BB to be present in as much nations in the world !

This Post:
33
278268.36 in reply to 278268.35
Date: 4/9/2016 9:35:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
346346
For me the best thing to do would be to merge the leagues but keep everything else individual to each nation, so micronation leagues work as a 'champions league' where the teams and players keep their flag, NT +u21, original players identities and why not keep micronations cups too to keep identity?

This would keep some identity and community but make the leagues more competitive.

This Post:
00
278268.39 in reply to 278268.38
Date: 4/9/2016 10:01:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
346346
That would be great, anything to keep the identity and community of micronations but also giving them an opportunity for more competition.

From: Knecht

To: RiP
This Post:
00
278268.40 in reply to 278268.1
Date: 4/9/2016 10:54:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
If you could tell a bit more about possible pairings of nations and a timeframe when the merger could happen, that might be helpful.

If a seeding was based on WR teams on the rise could experience a disadvantege.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
From: Misagh

To: RiP
This Post:
55
278268.41 in reply to 278268.40
Date: 4/9/2016 11:30:58 AM
Venomous Scorpions
Bartar
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
I dont like play in another league or with another flag ...
if you delete our league , I'll leave the game ...

you must increase users with Advertising . merging is not a true solution .

From: Phyr

This Post:
00
278268.42 in reply to 278268.40
Date: 4/9/2016 11:32:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
654654
I think it would be fair for to keep everyone in the division that they are in when they merge and almost do an inverse of the first couple of seasons of Utopia to redistribute the teams.

This Post:
00
278268.45 in reply to 278268.29
Date: 4/9/2016 12:03:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
113113

Hi Gerard ,
To be honest , either one of the three initial proposals , mine , or someone else , the game will lose users .
We can not satisfy everyone: doing nothing , or a significant change on micronations , the game will lose players . But one thing seems clear : many micronations players value on their flag!

The proposal I did would keep those micronations , which will welcome new players in their leagues thanks to "old" Utopia owners.
Of course I would like more Iranians, of Bahamians , Luxembourg , the Egyptians ... but I don't have the clue to let them come here... (except ads, app)

For the micronations : more competitiveness , more local trained players , a stronger NT, their country don't disapear.
For "old" owners of Utopia team : the opportunity to be in a high league, with more attractive returns than D.IV (yes, that is a great advantage of micronations !), the possibility to do the B3, to win a national cup... to help an other country.

If this could happen, be sure I would be one of the first to buy me a second team, and I'm sure that I'm not alone in this case. I'm also sure that some BB users will quit...
Failing to win newcomers , most may remain for this option which is more realistic than "Utopia"

Advertisement