BuzzerBeater Forums

Watching the boxscore between ESV Laim and djembe made me think a lot... I saw there was a really huge skill on the preparation for that match, really an impressive tactic from the small country team''

And the award to the best rookie in a small country team goes to: ''JohnnyB ¡¡¡¡'''

Small country is not equal to bad managers.

My congratulations.


Leaving the comedy aside, im going to try to comment something.

What comes to my mind is that the BB's(the goverment) have to make new economic changes, they cant let the community alone, they have to supervise and act when they think its going out of control... (Im sorry for my english but im not finding others words). What im trying to say is that the BB they should try to make changes to control the economy to an equal level more or less.

I mean i've seen the BB's hand on the transfer market to change the rising dinamic of it, for example the free agent comeback was in my opinion a good economic decision.

After reading Charles posts i can assume this: We are not going to chance the economy etc.

So the BB's use their invisible hand to control the market, but they dont use their invisible hand to make the things more balanced between small and big countrys?

I mean if you BB's pretend to dont touch the incomes of the small and big countrys, then dont touch also the transfer list market when this its going crazy, let them free, but acting in both directions its not the best solution, if you wanna change the direction of the economy do it in all the ways and if you think its better dont touch anything then dont touch the transfer list when this is rising.

After all this posts the JK solution was the best by far that I have read

So this is a funny post, the ones who complain:

-That BB's should act as the invisible hand to balance the unbalance between the small and big countrys incomes

And the others who defend: hey let the BB free of taxes or new economic changes, but after they accept the changes on the transfer list and thats a bit ironic

Well if ever my team be on the 4 best teams on BBB i will feel like i am the best manager of the game. 4 best.

we're happy to let big countries and small countries argue about who has it easier or harder or about who's doing a better job managing their teams

(19953693)

Small country team sneaks recent victory away at big country team!! BIG up all you small country managers!!!

Those are some incredible ratings from what must have been an incredible game. Congrats to both teams! Wow!!!

Last edited by somdetsfinest at 2/12/2010 8:37:15 AM

Well if ever my team be on the 4 best teams on BBB i will feel like i am the best manager of the game. 4 best.

Nice, you have perfectly got what has been said in this thread. Hope to see you and 3 minismallstan country teams fighting for the 4 best position in BB in 4 seasons time.

My... Am I really posting again in this thread??

For those stubborn small countries who seem not to get it.

Check my Transfer List: almost +10 mill (going to IV Spanish next season due to re-structure; currently no enormous income for having sold a player, actually I bought one for 3 mill; also, +300,000 in balance, and sure, no huge advance in my arena)

Check Gachai's Transfer List (sorry for the example): almost -22 mill, a "leader", with Siam Paragorn in Thailand.

Finally (I am afraid this is going to be about the last time I post in here), just please, imagine for a few seconds if my market skills would be applied to a small country's economy, and of course, the other way round (I do not really know where many of the rampant posting small countries in this thread would be if they had been for all these seasons in my boots. Spain has VI leagues...).

Fair enough

Last edited by Pappa Flaah at 2/12/2010 3:25:12 PM

He has taken more shots, more assists and more rebounds, this is another joke of the GE :p

just please, imagine for a few seconds if my market skills would be applied to a small country's economy,

I just looked up the word hubris in the dictionary, and your name was after it. Different situations necessitate different approaches. The only thing I got from your post is that you are getting relegated.

well, i JUST take into account the actual numbers, it is nothing against you. my +10 is an actual +10. your minus 22 is an actual minus 22. i do not see the point in talking about "hubris", i think i have not provoked you, and numbers say I could post what I post ;)

you can get whatever you want from my post, anyway, it's up to you. i'm sure not everyone has a same reading over a post, and i don't particularly care of yours. again, it's nothing against you.


Edit: a recent example of a player, for whom I know top Spanish team had made a "market movement" to sign, and finally went overpaid to a Bolivian team (6702650) whose TL is worth checking http://www.buzzerbeater.com/team/44514/transferhistory.as..., now plus -8,5 of this player

Last edited by Pappa Flaah at 2/13/2010 10:16:07 AM

Is useless guys. For the advertisements of friendlies and players they have said that the rules must be the same for everyone, not for the economy: the nice thing is that even they have admitted that there is a difference, but they say:"we play in different leagues". But for the advertisements of friendlies and players, do not play different leagues? But then the game should be the same for everyone? decide: when it 's convenient yes, otherwise not.
The possibilities are 3:
1) join the leagues of small countries
2) less average earnings from their stadium(based on average salaries of the league)
3) create local markets: the small countries buy players from small countries and large countries buy players from big countries
4) in any case reduce the effect of a defeat

For the advertisements of friendlies and players they have said that the rules must be the same for everyone, not for the economy: the nice thing is that even they have admitted that there is a difference, but they say:"we play in different leagues". But for the advertisements of friendlies and players, do not play different leagues?

the difference is that you don't have closed forum, if you have a italian forum i am also to post there - so such decision also affect the german leagues and a lot others ;)

And perhaps, the system is the same for those countrys, there first league is like your one. And yeah there progress is faster in the beginning, but this shouldn't affect you much, because they don't buy regulary your players they also sell them when they buy better ones and the total number of player in their teams is very limited. But i won't change with them, because the easier start is because of less competition which is some kind of boring for me.

1. advertise the game is always good.

2. i think they shouldn't be punish for weak opponent, maybe making it depending on their team salary like Josef KA suppose.

3. As i said, they also say them, and they can not hold that much players ;) And they prefer buying their own players cause of marketing.

4. Could be also a solution, but i think only on BBB terms and maybe the possibility to catch up against oppnents who start a bit earlier.(or against opponents in a weaker conference)

Last edited by CrazyEye at 2/13/2010 9:12:07 PM