You forget that you have also one game where you are gaining.
Your calculation is crooked.
If you´re not aiming just for money but for success, you´d lose roughly 280-300k. 3 home games and one away game where you actually earn more.
If you´d ask me, best change would be that any game 3 of a series had to be played without income. It´s pretty silly that teams lose game 2 intentionally just for fiscal reasons.
Also it is shortsighted. The 4th team has alot less wins, so you lose money (arena income) during the whole season compared to the guy on top. Sure you save some on the salaries, but I´m pretty sure that good management on the top, like you have shown over the last seasons, will earn more winning a league than tumbling around place 4-6.
You get a title, and you can play B3. Not worth it?
And you know, it´s easy to call for "make it more fair, more competitive" on the one hand, but you have to accept that "asking" requires "giving".
Teams giving by the changes?
Giving:
#1 overall, #1, #5, #5
Gaining:
#3, #3, #4, #4, #2, #2 (assuming that #1 has the bigger arena and #2 acutally manages to get things done in round 1)
Looks like a way to make things more competitve. What´s wrong with that?
The only ones crying are the #1 and #5 teams. While we all agree that #5 shall not cry, why would the #1? What do you expect? Is the BB universe build to keep teams on top forever or should it be a challenge and open to new users getting to the top?
There is 2 Teams in the league losing half a home game over the course of a season. Everyone to the escape please, worlds end is near!
Last edited by LA-seelenjaeger at 12/4/2012 7:50:55 AM
Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...