BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Season 38 new things

Season 38 new things

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
285774.37 in reply to 285774.32
Date: 3/20/2017 12:06:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I don't think 90% of users are fighting over kids to make sure they in end up in their country. Imagine the uk merged and scottish teams tank in all divisions, get all the hall of famers. Sounds fair for the english teams to just play perennial allstars for the seniors?
The draft will need to be adjusted of course, but that is a problem as a nation not individually. Each of you people in micronations individually can get MUCH better draftees on average than users who are in league with more human users.

So I agree that as a nation it's not good it would starve micronations of trainable players even more than now. Individually you are basically just get the same deal everyone else has.

Besides, in you example the Scots would get shafted because they would be the minority and there would be a much higher chance that some English manager tanks for picks. So I think you have that reversed.

This Post:
11
285774.38 in reply to 285774.36
Date: 3/20/2017 12:12:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I don't know what he meant but I can tell you thins: every single team who has a couple of bots in his league can happily tank till the end of time and never get a boycott. That means all micronation teams, all teams in the lowest level of competition in their nation (which, as you can imagine, are the majority) are completely unaffected.

Bots are the extreme example of differences in strength between nations. Boycott punishes losing, as if losing (and winning games against bots) are an intelligent way to decide who's tanking and who's trying to win but comes up short. In reality the boycott rule ends up:
a) Punishing teams who are trying in very challenging leagues or people who do not manage to compete due to injuries
b) Not punishing tanking teams if they have some bot opponent (because it's almost impossible to lose to a bot)

Last edited by Lemonshine at 3/20/2017 12:13:43 PM

This Post:
11
285774.40 in reply to 285774.39
Date: 3/20/2017 1:21:04 PM
Les Galactics
IV.30
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
Second Team:
La Castilla
ahah no politic here please :)

This Post:
00
285774.41 in reply to 285774.36
Date: 3/20/2017 1:26:31 PM
Durham Wasps
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
16621662
Second Team:
Sunderland Boilermakers
The boycott affects all teams which lose all the games in any third of a season. Tankers, who by definition have made a conscious decision to lose, will just make sure they win one game to avoid the boycott, as maximising income is the aim, and not losing.

The only people affected by the boycott are teams that aren't good enough to win a single game.

From: Lemonshine

To: Foto
This Post:
11
285774.43 in reply to 285774.42
Date: 3/20/2017 4:17:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Again not my place to suggest this, but honestly you'd be better off setting up 4 or 5 D1s for the first season. The difference in economy between d1 and d2 is pretty high and you may want to avoid people getting allocated to d2 based on their ranking changing right at the end of the season. It makes it very hard for them to plan ahead and also ranking is not a straightforward (it mostly depends on B3 perforrmance and the number of bots in each league....)

From: Jason

This Post:
22
285774.44 in reply to 285774.24
Date: 3/20/2017 5:08:23 PM
Arizona Desert Storm
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
11191119
No it wasn't the idea. I proposed it to get a more competitive tournament while keeping our domestic championship and identity. As too often those who shout loudest because in larger number have imposed their choice. Finally the decision was taken without the people most directly concerned having been heard..


I hear what you are saying...but I also believe this decision affects more than just teams in Africa. When you play in a small country and only have 1-5 active teams...you can coast by at the lowest possible salary without fear of relegating...maximize $$ more than bigger countries...and it gives a very significant advantage in acquiring players on the Transfer List. In bigger countries, it's the opposite...teams have to overspend to stay afloat, and significantly overspend if they want to compete for a Championship.

Personally, I hope this is just the start...I hope this trial works, and it leads to all micro-nations being merged to create more competitive environments so all leagues are dealing with the same issues and on the same playing field.

This Post:
00
285774.45 in reply to 285774.44
Date: 3/20/2017 5:19:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I hope they can decide quickly on a simple (and I stress simple) change to help the U21/NTs in those nations, because the national teams do help keeping smaller BB communities together

Last edited by Lemonshine at 3/20/2017 5:21:02 PM

Advertisement