BuzzerBeater Forums

Then only draft 2 rounds.Seriously who got any help from the Draft who's had a team over 2 seasons, no one. The Draft is a waste of time for almost 90% of team & I'm sure it takes a lot of work to process, so why not make it more relevant?

& have you noticed how the players with the "Better" skill sets are 19 & Starters at best? Superstars etc all have worse skill sets. Why? How is that helping smaller teams?

my first draft. i got someone with sarter pot. one with allstar, and one with star. culdve been better

Its random? They're supposed to be human players. Not manufactured robots. Of course there will be a range / differences.

I got a less than amazing draft too, but its all down to luck.

Who knows man????? Maybe certain leagues in "big" countries get a better share of good players.

Its all hidden man...all hidden i tell you..........underground business..............................



Last edited by OpTic.Phenom at 6/29/2010 1:21:37 AM

You misunderstand my use of random. I am in no way suggesting that the ratings result in random skill / wages.

I'm suggesting that the draft pool for every league is random. Yes some leagues will get a nice draft pool. Others won't. That's why its random?

You're taking one example of a 6900 wage player. We have no idea how many other players there are like that. How many leagues are there worldwide? How many players with 6900 salary?

He probably lucked out.

I agree that the scouting system could be worked on. Which they have and will be implementing this season. But IMHO, the draft pool variation (randomness) is fine. Unless you're suggesting every league gets at least one uber 6900 player. Which I think isn't realistic and pretty much pointless.

I don't really agree with that.

I don't want to over generalise and say all the players with 200k + salary players have been playing for many seasons but it looks that way to me.

Why do you want to be able to compete on level ground and have an impact immediately with players who have been playing and building and training their teams for a longer time? A nice roster that happens more or less after one draft pick? How realistic is that?
How does it kill the realism that the top league in America has the top players that have an immediate impact?

How many of the teams in leagues in American (granted I have no knowledge of American basketball leagues apart from the NBA) have players like Dwayne Wade or Lebron apart from the NBA? What would a player of that caliber be doing starting out in say a Division 5 team?

Edit: Basically I'm trying to say that the best of the best in American basketball are in the NBA thats why u see players that make an immediate impact.

Different strokes for different folks I guess. I'd rather slowly work my way up and enjoy thinking and building my team. To me that's what makes things interesting and fun.


Just my POV.. no offense.

Last edited by Simply Vince at 6/29/2010 5:49:16 AM