BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Remove draft

Remove draft

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
106376.37 in reply to 106376.36
Date: 8/27/2009 8:14:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
what kind of thought is that?So,if for example the GE will be bugged,they have only to explain to thte people"hey,the Ge is buggy,don't worry" and not working to make it better?



why is it buggy? Would you first explain that ;)

Are you joking?It was an example.You said that the actual drafting process is good and said in your previous post that BBs only have to change the rules for explaining better the process.the actual drafting process is not good,for the reasons that I,Newton,BlacKMouse (in other thread) and other users showing,but it's not an issue that you can solve simply changing two lines in the rules section

This Post:
00
106376.38 in reply to 106376.37
Date: 8/27/2009 8:52:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
you handle with extreme examples and say the system isn't good, that not a proove.

This Post:
00
106376.39 in reply to 106376.38
Date: 8/27/2009 9:18:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
(106376.19)
You are the first who sustain your opinion without giving a prove.
And the bad points of this system are showing every season.Newton show them,I show them in the previous post(that yu have yet read)what do you want more?

This Post:
00
106376.40 in reply to 106376.39
Date: 8/27/2009 3:12:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
that are such a short sample, so that even can say it a sample and just the zero are taken unbiased ;) Because the thing was i am incredible bad ;)

You say three for zero, i could say i got normally 6 5 star players with 5k investment. Thats better, and maybe worth the extra money, but also this numbers are sometimes way higher(rekord would be 11, lowest 3) but also depend on the current draft in the league which makes your proove even more funny because you know nothing how bad the scouting resutl of your example is really. like i said i gave league with maximum 5 5 star player, there would be three of them a top number.

This Post:
00
106376.41 in reply to 106376.40
Date: 8/27/2009 3:37:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
The problem is not the number of the strong players that are in the draft,but the quality of the observations,especially the second.If i pay something for the draft,I cannot be simply "lucky" that my second observations went to a five star player or a 1 star player.That's the point.

This Post:
00
106376.42 in reply to 106376.41
Date: 8/27/2009 3:50:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but with your system, you get normally all infos you need with 5k investment which isn't a improvement, when you argue that investing isn't worth especially because 5k is actually still worth because you got better observations even if you got also some more worse too.

if you really don't get extra informations, you are right and the system is buggy.

This Post:
00
106376.43 in reply to 106376.42
Date: 8/27/2009 4:02:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
but with your system, you get normally all infos you need with 5k investment which isn't a improvement, when you argue that investing isn't worth especially because 5k is actually still worth because you got better observations even if you got also some more worse too.

if you really don't get extra informations, you are right and the system is buggy.

No,it's not right.To avoid what are you saying,i posted you the proposal of BlackMouse,which talk about the probabilities of the second observations:60% it's not so high,and when you spend more on scouters,you will find more good players and will have more good second observations on them.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
106376.45 in reply to 106376.44
Date: 8/27/2009 4:42:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
yeah but with this proposal you will also found more with less investment, so the ratio is the same ;9

And the people who nowadays thing the information they get with no or less money are enough to get a good pick, will pay less in the new system because they get the necessary information cheaper.

From: Under_G
This Post:
00
106376.46 in reply to 106376.45
Date: 8/27/2009 6:57:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Now you con only decide the amount of money to spend and, sometimes, it´s spended in trush information, such as the potencial of player with just one ball.

Here i leave my suggestion waiting for your opinions:
1.- Generate the players at the begining of the season
2.- Select, every week, who is going a be watched, recibing the data during the same week.
3.- 3 looks necesary to see all the information of each player. In the first one some basic data: age, heith and best position. In the second one, the actual ball valoration after a game. The last one, the potencial of the player.
4.- To balance with the actual sistem, the minimum amount will report the data of 5 player in the first case, 3 player en the second and 2 in the last.

With that sistem, i think, the draft will be much helpful to plan our teams, cause if you need a playmaker you could study all the playmakers....

Thanks, and i hope you like it

This Post:
11
106376.47 in reply to 106376.46
Date: 8/27/2009 7:28:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
Seriously, this is my solution. You can't make money off the draft unless you are incredibly lucky. So spend your $640,000 elsewhere.

I bet if everyone did that the BBs would work on a new draft system.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
Advertisement