My roster cap is closer to 500k. I just only use 200k of it.
So my point is that I could spend 500k in salaries, but I don't need to, and so I get to keep some profit each week to try and improve.
It's not a your worth to have an high profit in your condition.
When I hear some users comment about the "complaining" of Italian and Spanish managers,boasting themself of having a high weekly profit, with some phrases like "You have to earn more from arena" or "You have to find a way to run your team better and so make a profit" or "You are whining because there are better teams in your league" or "You want to have advantages in your competition",I like to see their team page and try to understand what they are doing to try to improve their team
And I like to understand what strategy they are following for their future,no matter if they have a better economic situation.You can blow up your team and completaly rebuild it,you can be a skill trader,you can try to boost in the short time your team to be promoted,you can try to train some old strong player to build your team around him in the subsequent seasons,you can train some player that can replace your older players and so on...
But I often see teams that reach a position near the half position in their league and stop them,only waiting money to buy someone on the market,and they can raise a lot of money because of the condition of the competitivity in their league,where they don't need to even improve o change a little bit their team
It's not a problem if a user gain 100-200-300k every week,it's a problem that some teams gain these money not because of a strategy,but because of the structural conditions .If I would to blow up my team,I could earn 200k/week,but I would have to pay the consequences of my choice in the short time,and then have the possible benefits of my strategy.....the part of your speech that I underlined in bold,explains instead why the actual situation is wrong.You don't spend money because you don't need to spend it,and this can be a good choice;but at this point how can't you see the advantage that you have on the market,against teams that have to spend like you,or more than you to stay in a league and have much less incomes?The market is global,and your money have the same value of the mine,but you can raise them to use in the market in a much more faster and easier way than me,damaging my market and my projects.And You can't even say "it's the same for all",because a purchase on the market in a specific period can change the destiny of a season and of a team,so if I lose a player in a specific moment,by a user that outbid the player I need because of his more favourable condition,it's not the same of another team in my league that have different moments and different objectives in that period than me....And the your is not a real strategy,because while it's true that you can chose to stay much below your roster cap and raise money during the season,it doesn't mean that you can't have some 18-19years old with low salary to train and maintain in the team or sell in the future,so raising money in the short time and increasing the value of your team selling young players after some season of traing or having new good players in your team
The point of my overall speech is that the system should work in the way that you have to earn every cent if you deserve it,it should not give money only because of the awful competitivity condition in a league