BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > PF playing as SF

PF playing as SF

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
111222.38 in reply to 111222.37
Date: 9/23/2009 8:09:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i make this also for skill contributing, because i you have algorithms depending on size about the skill one single "high" skill could change a lot and isn't that improper(for a quite solid salary you need more skills for the position, and aren't just a center on the paper). Thats why the centers aren't really good(and normally you get 3k player for very small money and are the low end the teams are playing).

This Post:
00
111222.39 in reply to 111222.38
Date: 9/23/2009 8:42:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
Well there are even quite solid players under 3k, sometimes surprisingly good, nothing but usable as another trainee. I did skill trading (several weeks period) with such players once when I didnť have any serious longterm for remaining training slots. it payed off.

Last edited by docend24 at 9/23/2009 8:43:01 AM

This Post:
00
111222.41 in reply to 111222.40
Date: 9/28/2009 4:15:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
That's the answer I got the last time I asked BB-Charles how he feels about adding a "short/medium/tall" distinction for height (and believe me, I've tried to drive this idea in just because it is a plausible way for scouting to work).

I guess we will just have to settle for a probabilistic outcome (being listed as a PG gives a high probability of short height, and vice versa).

Of course, to quote a recent NBA champion, "Anything is possibleeeeeee"... but I wouldn't exactly hold my breath on this one.

Last edited by GM-kozlodoev at 9/28/2009 4:15:45 PM

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."