BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Overextention tax

Overextention tax

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
252784.39 in reply to 252784.37
Date: 12/28/2013 7:57:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
536536
Yes, but it's an exemption. I really doubt that it can go negative, that would be stupid.

For example, if you weren't training and your vets dropped in salary, you have training exemption -30k? I just don't think so, but BBs should confirm, since the given explanation is controversial.



Question from the last few posts, which I have redirected to yourself

This Post:
00
252784.41 in reply to 252784.40
Date: 12/28/2013 8:06:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
The only thing I'm terrified about is that it's a huge change, and we never heard anything of this nature before.

And I still think promotion just became very difficult

Last edited by Boston Celts at 12/28/2013 8:12:50 AM

This Post:
00
252784.42 in reply to 252784.40
Date: 12/28/2013 8:06:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
536536
Just look a post before yours



Thank you for your quick answer.

So for instance my player Quincy Riviera who I have had for a few seasons and is aged 32 and currently has a salary of 108K.

So you are saying that his salary wont continue to be calculated out at a 108K in a few seasons time when it drops to 50K?


So essentially it is the players salary at the time you purchase them or their current salary - Which ever is the cheaper

is this correct?

Last edited by Sid Vicious at 12/28/2013 8:07:31 AM

This Post:
00
252784.44 in reply to 252784.43
Date: 12/28/2013 8:42:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345

About promotion don't forget that you are calling to fight against teams which are playing under the same rules as you so why this rule makes promotion more difficult?




because once I promote I need to pay this tax if I want to stay in that league. Leagues 3 and 4 not so much but promotion to 1 and 2 has always been like this. If you don't adjust with some new overpaid players you relegate. And you cannot do that by paying this tax. This is my view

This Post:
00
252784.46 in reply to 252784.21
Date: 12/28/2013 9:29:24 AM
Ghost Masters
BLNO
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
IMO, until a team is on National cup, tax shold take care of it. That 50k for every stagewin are still a weekly gain.


Exactly my point, lets say I have balance -40k, that means that after cup game I have profit of 10K, and know I will have -20K instead.

Last edited by Ghost Master at 12/28/2013 9:30:18 AM

This Post:
11
252784.47 in reply to 252784.44
Date: 12/28/2013 9:35:59 AM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I think your tactic of selling young trained players to buy vets for promotion may still be viable. I think the value for players that are in the 20-40k range that will soon see their salary balloon will rise, and my guess is to the point you'll be able to cover the OT for the few playoff weeks. Also, the value of players at the end of the season, who expect to see a raise salary is updated will also rise. I think you'll have to make adjustments but you could still make your tactics viable.

This Post:
00
252784.48 in reply to 252784.43
Date: 12/28/2013 9:39:20 AM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
@Sid Vicious
So essentially it is the players salary at the time you purchase them or their current salary - Which ever is the cheaper

It's the players salary at the time you purchase them. It's also written in the news
This applies only to the salary your players have when they are acquired

I think the news post may be wrong on this. From what I've heard from someone who did the math on their players, and has players that have had their salary reduced, it took into consideration their updated reduced salary as opposed to what it was when they were acquired. I think that seems more fair as well.
Edit: I may have misinterpreted, since what I thinkk you said earlier in this thread about older vets' salary seems to be correct.

Last edited by Fresh24 at 12/28/2013 9:51:58 AM

Advertisement