BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Draft List Questions~

Draft List Questions~

Set priority
Show messages by
From: kLepTo

This Post:
33
146657.381 in reply to 146657.379
Date: 9/27/2010 9:03:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
102102
Player 2 hands down. It'll either be MVP, HoF, or ATG. Could be a couple of million or more in the TL. Just 'coz he's SG doesn't mean you'll train him as such.

Last edited by kLepTo at 9/27/2010 9:04:12 PM

From: Krazy Kay

This Post:
00
146657.382 in reply to 146657.371
Date: 9/27/2010 9:20:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
I am suggesting that every league have a higher quality of draftees available or atleast closer range in terms of top pics.

Starting out newer/midlevel players with 6 to even 10k salary rookies is reasonable to me when there are tons of teams out there with 200k salary players.

I like to draw inferences to RL basketball and I knwo people hate that... but in the NBA guys like Lebron and Dwayne Wade made an impact immediately. In BB you need 2-5 seasons of training MINIMUM to even start to compete with the best players. That really kills the realizm a lot.


does the draft scale per div level? Is a 5 star/5 ball player always going to be a certain salary level (around 5k i think) no matter if he is a div I prospect or div VI prospect?

If that is the case a scalling system seems like it should be used. A top prospect in a div I league should be far better than a top prospect in a div VI. A top prospect should be at least starting calibur for that division. The problem is with training, they could become super monsters due to their high starting skill set and young age of 18 or 19. perhaps the happy medium would be to create starting calibur players AND also scale the age. maybe a 10k salary guy would be 20 or 21 yrs old. That would offset the training issue that might be created.


From: Dunkface

This Post:
00
146657.384 in reply to 146657.379
Date: 9/28/2010 4:57:34 AM
Arizona Cacti
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
276276
Def player 2. He'll end up being trained as a PF but his probable small guy secondaries will be pretty valuable.

This Post:
00
146657.385 in reply to 146657.384
Date: 9/28/2010 7:04:14 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Which would you take. Both 5 ball rating. 19/5 ball potential (6'7") vs. 18/3 ball potential (6'11"). Both SF.

This Post:
00
146657.386 in reply to 146657.385
Date: 9/28/2010 7:14:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
204204
Depends on what you want to achieve. The 18yo will be more of a PF than a SF. If you want to sell the player, it's pretty much of a tossup. 18yo sell for more than 19yos, but potential is often overpaid for.

Ultimately, the 19yo probably won't reach his full potential though, so I'd take the 18yo if I wanted to train my pick.

This Post:
00
146657.387 in reply to 146657.386
Date: 9/28/2010 7:43:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Thanks. It's really got my confused, I've been switching them for a while. Still undecided. I miss my 5/5 18yo from last season :(

This Post:
00
146657.388 in reply to 146657.387
Date: 9/28/2010 9:10:26 AM
Aussie Pride
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
543543
I'm in a similar position. I would take a 5/5 19 year old ahead of a 5/3 18 year old but would probably take a 5/4 18 year old ahead of the 5/5 19 year old.

This Post:
00
146657.389 in reply to 146657.11
Date: 9/28/2010 4:42:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
What potentials correlate with each ball amount?

From: Suzifex
This Post:
00
146657.390 in reply to 146657.389
Date: 9/28/2010 8:52:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Should I place a 5/3 A+ C 6'11" 19 year old or 5/3 A SG 6'0" 18 year old first?

From: kLepTo

This Post:
00
146657.391 in reply to 146657.390
Date: 9/28/2010 9:47:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
102102
Should I place a 5/3 A+ C 6'11" 19 year old or 5/3 A SG 6'0" 18 year old first?



The 2nd guy seems to be the obvious choice.

Advertisement