BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Basic Training Advice

Basic Training Advice

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
126355.39 in reply to 126355.38
Date: 1/6/2010 1:35:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Just by how much would you say it slows down? I plan on tacking OD to about 17-18 while the HN and DR will stay at around 12-13. Will I have significant problems doing that? I do plan on doing quite a bit of one position training were OD is concerned.

This Post:
00
126355.40 in reply to 126355.39
Date: 1/6/2010 2:10:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Just by how much would you say it slows down? I plan on tacking OD to about 17-18 while the HN and DR will stay at around 12-13. Will I have significant problems doing that? I do plan on doing quite a bit of one position training were OD is concerned.


I believe it would slow down enough to make the last couple pops a real drag.


NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
126355.41 in reply to 126355.40
Date: 1/6/2010 2:24:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Ok, thanks. I will keep it in mind. I wasn't sure if I wanted to archive those last pop or two through pressure training or handling, but I guess what you say reassures me that I might need to do some handling training late. By the way how is the OD going to be effected by the fact that it is a runaway skill in terms of secondary training. Will training it indirectly still produce a diminishing return?

This Post:
00
126355.42 in reply to 126355.41
Date: 1/6/2010 2:35:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Will training it indirectly still produce a diminishing return?


Probably, but not enough to be entirely concerned about it.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
126355.43 in reply to 126355.42
Date: 1/6/2010 2:42:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Ok. Thanks a lot for the info. Sounds like that is how I will approach it then.

This Post:
00
126355.44 in reply to 126355.9
Date: 1/6/2010 9:39:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Well, I am not quite used to this Buzzer Beater system because I am new. However, from what it seems so far, players's jumprange from mediocre-respectable is nota big factor when you play in tactics that they can't really shoot the outside balls. For example, in the Princeton offense, my SF/PF was the one that was shooting and making the 3's (5-6 exactually). On the other hand, my guards, not just SG, took about 2 each in average. Whiles making 50 percent of it. in the Motion offense my guards attemptedabout 5 tp 7 threes each. Wjiles making 25 percent of them my point of view is, when you train your team in Jumprange, it is not going to be a factor when you play them in a tactic that does not empower them to take advantage of their talent.

I stick with Jumpshot over Jumprange. When I study my opponents's players and notice that their SG or SF does not not have good outside defense, that is when I may set the training to jumprange.

This Post:
00
126355.45 in reply to 126355.44
Date: 1/7/2010 4:49:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
this could have the reason, that the opposition of the c is much weaker normally JR matters with Princeton(also and motion) heavily on the position 1 to 3. But the system is also looking for the best shooting abilitiy, so when your player can not throw the ball, he would normally shoot less and not with a much weaker percentage.