BuzzerBeater Forums

BBAPI Support > New features

New features

Set priority
Show messages by
From: jantzen

This Post:
00
163625.39 in reply to 163625.38
Date: 5/25/2011 8:34:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5353
My guess as well.

I was just a question. I was thinking that maybe the team could be locked by the administrators.

From: Pouah

This Post:
00
163625.40 in reply to 163625.35
Date: 7/26/2011 2:59:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3232
Hello !
It's been a while i havent posted here !
Sorry to disturb you, but i have found a small bug in the BBAPI with players who have a potential all-time great.

Let's take that player for example (20999179)
bbapi.buzzerbeater.com/player.aspx?playerid=20999179 give us potential of 11
while http://bbapi.buzzerbeater.com/roster.aspx?teamid=84768 give us a potential of 10

All others potentials seem to be ok.

From: mitx

This Post:
00
163625.41 in reply to 163625.40
Date: 7/26/2011 3:31:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110

All others potentials seem to be ok.

Dear Pouah,

It's wrong! The potential BuzzerBeater developer (0-) like my player (18701957) is given announcer (0) by BBApi. And I have 2 BuzzerBeater developer!!! ;)


Last edited by mitx at 7/26/2011 3:45:04 PM

Message deleted
This Post:
00
163625.43 in reply to 163625.40
Date: 7/26/2011 4:36:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9999
It is not a new thing, two highest potencial are the same, 10 in xml.

Last edited by RTFM-urimate at 7/26/2011 4:36:43 PM

This Post:
00
163625.44 in reply to 163625.43
Date: 7/27/2011 2:40:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3232
It has been corrected by BB-Marin (163625.11) but only in player.aspx and not in roster.aspx

This Post:
00
163625.45 in reply to 163625.44
Date: 7/27/2011 4:37:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9999
Hmmm. It would be useful to correct it on roster page too, I use it for scouting :P.

This Post:
00
163625.46 in reply to 163625.45
Date: 7/27/2011 7:32:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3232
Same here !
It's takes less bandwidth.

Last edited by Pouah at 7/27/2011 7:33:12 AM

From: BB-Marin

This Post:
00
163625.47 in reply to 163625.44
Date: 2/14/2012 8:23:55 AM
TrenseRI
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
36003600
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
From: Pouah

This Post:
00
163625.48 in reply to 163625.47
Date: 2/14/2012 3:46:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3232
I had seen it ;)

Thank you !!!

This Post:
00
163625.49 in reply to 163625.12
Date: 2/14/2012 5:11:18 PM
Le Cotiche
III.1
Overall Posts Rated:
772772
time to try again with my 2 old requests

waiting since 2008

is it possible to repeat in the standings xml the information if a team is a bot?
i know it's already shown in teaminfo but if i want to calculate the number of bots in the leagues above mine it would mean a LOT of bbapi calls (so, a lot of time for my tool to work and a lot of stress for the servers)


waiting since 2009

standings is not correct for teams who gave walkovers

example: leagueId 256. oregina basket is shown before chief emperor by BBAPI, but in real standings it's behind because of walkovers


the example is about season 9
btw, this is funny because now also the web page doesn't show their WO anymore


Last edited by mark_lenders at 2/14/2012 5:11:45 PM

Advertisement