BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Training have to be 48+?

Training have to be 48+?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
131787.4 in reply to 131787.3
Date: 2/17/2010 4:51:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
from juice, i also be closer to 1-2%

This Post:
00
131787.5 in reply to 131787.3
Date: 2/17/2010 4:52:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
48 Minutes= 100% training
47 Minutes(or less)= (give or take) 75%-90% training (or less). Definately not 1-2% (meaning no correlation)

This is been known and I believe told by a GM (legend said once there is a guy named Juice...)a few seasons ago..

yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the "present."
This Post:
00
131787.6 in reply to 131787.5
Date: 2/17/2010 4:56:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
48 Minutes= 100% training
47 Minutes(or less)= (give or take) 75%-90% training (or less). Definately not 1-2% (meaning no correlation)


and we are talking over 47:30-47:59 and for this i would be pretty sure about the 0-2 percent ;)

This is been known and I believe told by a GM (legend said once there is a guy named Juice...)a few seasons ago..


this wasn't been known, and was hardly discussed with him alone at the point. Maybe he is rigth but i wouldn't bet on it, because i often stop giving minutes after 43 training mins and max with 43 minutes i would go for that high training loss.

This Post:
00
131787.7 in reply to 131787.6
Date: 2/17/2010 5:03:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
47:30-47:59; if you are talking about this specific time frame; I guess no one gave confirmation of what percentage loss that would mean. 47:59 will show 48 on weekly stats right? I could not comment what would be the effect on training then..

yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the "present."
This Post:
00
131787.8 in reply to 131787.5
Date: 2/17/2010 5:05:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
259259
48 Minutes= 100% training
47 Minutes(or less)= (give or take) 75%-90% training (or less). Definately not 1-2% (meaning no correlation)

This is been known and I believe told by a GM (legend said once there is a guy named Juice...)a few seasons ago..



if what that you say it's truth, then a player that play just 40-43 minutes, don't even get training :)

This Post:
00
131787.9 in reply to 131787.8
Date: 2/17/2010 5:10:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I cannot confirm or provide evidence. But I did read somewhere that for example 40-47 minutes equals to 90-75% training. From that moment I held this as a rule of thumb to manage my training minutes.

But as mentioned earlier; apparently I misread a bit and you guys were talking about the specific time frame 47:30->47:59(weekly stats show 48).

Then I cannot provide any ideas..:o

yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the "present."
This Post:
00
131787.10 in reply to 131787.9
Date: 2/17/2010 6:08:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
259259
But I did read somewhere that for example 40-47 minutes equals to 90-75% training.


agree with that.


But as mentioned earlier; apparently I misread a bit and you guys were talking about the specific time frame 47:30->47:59(weekly stats show 48).

yes, we are talking about this :)

Last edited by Azrail at 2/17/2010 6:22:51 AM

This Post:
00
131787.11 in reply to 131787.5
Date: 2/17/2010 12:31:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
48 Minutes= 100% training
47 Minutes(or less)= (give or take) 75%-90% training (or less). Definately not 1-2% (meaning no correlation)

This is been known and I believe told by a GM (legend said once there is a guy named Juice...)a few seasons ago..


And the BBs pretty much said Juice was wrong. In fact, once upon a time there was no distinction between 48 and 48+ in that table (both were 48+). The BBs did not think that the small difference was worth having a different category... But some people complained, so they fixed it.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
131787.12 in reply to 131787.11
Date: 2/17/2010 12:41:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
And the BBs pretty much said Juice was wrong.


He sucks.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
131787.13 in reply to 131787.12
Date: 2/17/2010 12:43:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155


He sucks.


Well, I kind of miss him. He was right 99.9% of the time.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
131787.14 in reply to 131787.13
Date: 2/17/2010 2:41:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Well, I kind of miss him. He was right 99.9% of the time.


True; rumours said thats why they retired the verb "juiced"; just like in NBA when they retire numbers for players who changed basketball as it once was.

yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the "present."
Advertisement