BuzzerBeater Forums

if he would be a star he should play right from the beginning, i think at this point of the game your other players cant be that much better, also sometimes you have to sacrifice something for your youth, anyway your choice, but as i said everyone playing this game got the same limits on the trainingposition, so you got no disadvantage.

i never said i have a disadvantage. i'm giving suggestions to make the game better and giving examples that happen in real lif in real leagues. why should i sell my 2nd round pick every year because they are not ready for big rotation minutes. Almost every team in the world has an 11th or 12 player who is their for either practice to improve or expierence. Then allot of those payers or either loaned to gain expierence before or never become what they should have, This has nothing to do with me. I would like the option in future seasons when my stars start getting older and i can still play them instead of selling them for younger players who are not ready because i cant gaurentee them 48 minutes a week.

does it means that every strong team will have in the future his own farms?

I don`t like this idea at all....

This would certainly encourage day trading. Bad idea.

this is not a farm system. You dont own the team you are sending him to. You can send him to another country. It is for lower teams to get better players and help them with out paying their whole salary and you get your 18 year ols 2nd round pick aa chance to play and prove his worth to you before you decide to sell him. This idea works even better if there is a cap on how many players your team can own.

ok, after this will be done I will send a money to 5 people which will train for me my players, thank you:)

Last edited by Iordanou at 3/15/2008 1:30:02 PM

So I guess what you're saying is (select any number of responses listed below):

(a)You want to train more players for less effort on your part
(b) You want to train more players for less expenditure of money
(c) It makes perfect sense for teams in lower divisions to train a player from another team and in return gain no long-term benefit from said players training
(d) Teams in lower leagues do not have draft picks of their own to train
(e) Teams in lower leagues cannot afford trainees and so instead should do higher league teams a big favour

I don't think player loans will improve the game. It's a system far too open to abuse.

First of all it helps the lower division teams as they get a player that can help them win now. Teams all over Europe do this now. Secondly the player is on their team so they get to choose how to train the player which might be good or bad for me depending on what they are doing. Third they might have a poor trainer which will make it harder for my player to get better faster, and as for the money I am still paying his salary. The team loaning the player does not get a long term investment but if they can’t afford players on the transfer list then this is the next best thing. It also will slow down day trading as lower teams will gladly take a loaner for the season instead of killing themselves financially. The system can’t be abused so much unless you have two teams you’re controlling and you use the second one only to benefit your loaned players. Now think of this for a team in division 4 or 5. They don’t sell out and get loads of money for selling players. Now they can bring in a solid player or a star for that league to help them get to the next level and save their money to get involved in the transfer bidding.