BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Grade ratings for draft

Grade ratings for draft

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
221765.5 in reply to 221765.4
Date: 7/11/2012 4:42:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
Thanks! That helps alot

This Post:
00
221765.6 in reply to 221765.2
Date: 7/12/2012 1:02:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
Salary wise

A+ = 4500+
A = 4200 - 4500
A- = 3900- 4200
B+ = 3600-3900
B = 3300-3600
B- = 2900-3300




And to OP as well...
Don't just solely use this too though... Bob Cody, the ATG, was a A- according to the guy who drafted him, whom is in my league. He was actually the guy's 2nd choice, behind an A+ he'd found, but he got lucky in that it fell to the A-

If they are both 5/5 kinda guys... Puts you in a tough spot.

From: Kukoc
This Post:
00
221765.8 in reply to 221765.6
Date: 7/12/2012 3:29:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
I don't know if anyone has actually done a study on those salarys, but every single one of them is wrong.
My study (has 3 seasons of draft info on 18yo's and the study continues this season):
5 stars lowest 3896
4 stars highest 3702
4 stars lowest 3007
3 stars highest 2984
3 stars lowest 2476
2 stars highest 2432
2 stars lowest 1919
1 stars highest 1733

Ranges between 4-3 stars and 3-2 stars are pretty narrow. I'm hoping to narrow the cap on 5-4 star range the coming draft.

This Post:
00
221765.9 in reply to 221765.7
Date: 7/12/2012 3:30:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
What tough spot? Any 5/5 guy with an A- rating or better is someone you can work with. And I think you really need to draft the player who looks better (has the better grade), even if there's a chance it doesn't work out. Certainly, no one consistently TRIES to pick the inferior players.



Well... after hearing his story... makes me wonder how often the A+ vs A- when both are 5/5, whom has the better potential, or has skills more rounded/workable initially...

Tough spot because it planted a seed of doubt.

This Post:
00
221765.10 in reply to 221765.9
Date: 7/12/2012 5:04:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
Both guys are 5 star and 4 potential. One is a sg and the other is SF so idk what do. The SF is the A- and sf's are harder to find IMO

This Post:
11
221765.11 in reply to 221765.10
Date: 7/12/2012 6:29:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
573573
The problem with draftees listed as SF is that they can often have high salary because they have high JS and RB. That means it's possible that they have a hole in their OD, which can be killer for a future PG/SG/SF .

An high salary SG will typically have good JR and OR, which in my opinion are more valuable, considering they are single position training weeks.

This Post:
00
221765.12 in reply to 221765.11
Date: 7/12/2012 7:31:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
The problem with draftees listed as SF is that they can often have high salary because they have high JS and RB. That means it's possible that they have a hole in their OD, which can be killer for a future PG/SG/SF .

An high salary SG will typically have good JR and OR, which in my opinion are more valuable, considering they are single position training weeks.


Yeah. go with the SG

This Post:
00
221765.14 in reply to 221765.9
Date: 7/13/2012 5:14:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
706706
Well... after hearing his story... makes me wonder how often the A+ vs A- when both are 5/5, whom has the better potential, or has skills more rounded/workable initially...

Tough spot because it planted a seed of doubt.


Grade ratings say a lot about player's starting skills through provisional salary. So A+ will always be better then A- (assuming they have the same potential) solely because you'll maybe need half of season of training (or more) to get the A- guy to acceptable levels of starting skills - to A+. :) With A+ you get that at the beginning of the season.

From my experience, A+ players have at least mediocre in primary skills for designated position. And beware of 218 cm tall PGs or 185 cm tall Cs :)


Advertisement