That would make sense but the news item says
Players will not be any more or less effective at playing any position as a result of these changes.
..and that is puzzling. It seems to say that the suggested position is NOT calculated based on the actual factors determining playing strength, but on something that is intentionally misleading ;-)
Not really that puzzling.
A player will not all of a sudden start getting worse or better at a position if his Best Position changes.
If you have a guy that puts up an average 7.0 rating at PF and 8.0 at C, and then his Best Position changes based on that News item, he will then put up an average rating of 7.0 at PF and 8.0 at C.
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live