BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - IV.45 > How I Would Structure BB Without Promotions/Demotions/Divisions

How I Would Structure BB Without Promotions/Demotions/Divisions

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
292018.4 in reply to 292018.1
Date: 1/12/2018 10:55:59 AM
Cyborgs
III.7
Overall Posts Rated:
6060
Second Team:
Brawlers
I like you ideas, the one thing I would like to see is a Cap on Salaries for each team in each Division.... I know the Cyborgs are way above salary Cap and its killing me each update on Monday's ... plus after seeing the numerous skills drops on a few of my older players this morning did not make me happy... I might have to think about unloading 1 or 2 .... back on track here with the salary Cap in effect I think all the teams would be more competitive with each other and a lot more would be riding on the development of your trainees as to winning or losing games and also the tactics you employ against opponents..
One other thing I wish would have happened instead of Utopia was to be able to have a developmental team to where you could train and call up players as needed if you have an injury or you would want to run a different tactic against an opponent or even if you need a better rebounder, etc.. for a certain game... you would have the ability to do that and still remain within the salary Cap confines.... well that's all I can think of at the moment...

This Post:
00
292018.5 in reply to 292018.4
Date: 1/12/2018 11:09:14 AM
Risers
IV.10
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
I think your roster is still way ahead of the pack even with the skill drops. If you let one guy go you'll probably still be.

You make a good point about development being even more important with a salary cap in place. I didn't feel the need to use one in my original idea because I feel like limitting rosters accomplishes a fair balance.

Last edited by Matt D at 1/12/2018 11:24:34 AM

This Post:
00
292018.6 in reply to 292018.5
Date: 1/13/2018 12:42:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1818
Just thinking out loud:

If teams stayed in the same league, even after a champion is crown. And the only free agencies/players available are from your league. You would most likely see less 40-60 year old players in this game. And in a sense players would retire, at a "normal" age. Not sure, but more training of younger player's would probably go on. And this is how the top team, the aka champion team, would not stay atop "forever"

Another thing, im not sure how many active teams there really are, but you would have less if any bot teams. This part has nothing to do with the new teams in this league, but new teams are kinda scary because you DON'T know if their be active or not. This wouldnt change things either way, and really has nothing to do with anything.

If theres an odd # of active teams, add an extra team or two to leagues, OR have 20 teams per league. (10 on each side, with only 4 teams making playoffs) i think it would definitely keep the playoff race interesting up until the final day. Most seasons than not anyway.

*More realistic BB, then it is right now*

This Post:
00
292018.7 in reply to 292018.6
Date: 1/13/2018 1:36:04 PM
Cyborgs
III.7
Overall Posts Rated:
6060
Second Team:
Brawlers
>>> Maybe try running it more like the NBA...

This Post:
00
292018.8 in reply to 292018.6
Date: 1/13/2018 8:54:06 PM
Risers
IV.10
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Yup. With a limited free agent market, it makes star players more valuable, being that there are only sixteen teams training players. Which also means that the stars that DO exist will have legacies of their own which adds to the immersiveness of the BB experience. That's missing right now because, unless you're in a top division in an active country/region, there is always a player available on the TL to make your team better. Especially if you're not imposing self restrictions, like me, with only buying USA players.

Like you said, a concern in a promotionless system is inactivity. But I do believe that playing with the same people and developing rivalries would keep even the non playoff teams interested. Another thing you could do is give new managers control of an inactive team as is, instead of an entirely new one. In a one league system it would be bad if an entire team goes into free agency when a new manager joins the game. The best teams would just pick up the good players and become even more dominant, leaving the new guy and the bottom teams screwed for a long time, which will result in more inactivity.

I think sixteen teams is fine. I'd rather have more seasons to play through.