BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > cheaters

cheaters (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
32170.4 in reply to 32170.3
Date: 5/20/2008 4:21:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
It's been decided that anything regarding cheating is between the staff and the users.

There's little value to exposing names of cheaters.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
32170.5 in reply to 32170.4
Date: 5/20/2008 4:29:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727
Well I think it will become the same as in HT where no one cares about reporting cheaters because there will be just too many of them.

Last edited by profit007 at 5/20/2008 4:30:01 PM

This Post:
00
32170.6 in reply to 32170.5
Date: 5/20/2008 4:49:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Well I think it will become the same as in HT where no one cares about reporting cheaters because there will be just too many of them.


So the 3620 HT locked last week all were magically produced?

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Message deleted
This Post:
00
32170.8 in reply to 32170.5
Date: 5/20/2008 5:50:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Well I think it will become the same as in HT where no one cares about reporting cheaters because there will be just too many of them.



You dont see the result straight away because the outcome isnt always instant. Rest assured everyone is dealt with and we appreciate every submission. Nice thing is that cheaters nearly always re-offend (especially if they think they are getting away with it) so chances are any delay in finalising a punishment normally results with us receiving a new report from someone else which in turn makes our decision that much easier.

Bottom line is they are being dealt with. Every single one of them.

This Post:
00
32170.9 in reply to 32170.8
Date: 5/20/2008 6:01:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727

Well I guess this is the feedback I was looking for:)


This Post:
00
32170.10 in reply to 32170.9
Date: 5/21/2008 3:44:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
to add to the answer: should someone get wrongfully accused by a cheatrepporter, and GMs investigate it and decide he is no cheater, his teamname would be in everyone's minds, which is obviously very bad.
The real cheaters won't be bothered being in the list, since they loose their team anyway.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
32170.11 in reply to 32170.10
Date: 5/23/2008 7:11:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5353
Instead of reporting names couldn't you report a kind of status like:
x cheaters taken out.
x teams suspended ?
x illegal transfer managed?

I think its good to show to the public that some actions is performed.

This Post:
00
32170.12 in reply to 32170.11
Date: 5/23/2008 9:49:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
The number of cheaters locked per week is listed on the Report Cheaters page.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live