BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Player ratings

Player ratings

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
36151.4 in reply to 36151.3
Date: 6/19/2008 11:05:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Defense definitely affects player ratings.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
36151.5 in reply to 36151.4
Date: 6/19/2008 12:46:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
Defense definitely affects player ratings.

indeed!
Iif you play a team with a star, who prevents your own player from scoring, BUT your player also manages quite well to hold this star away from many baskets as well, it's only normal your player gets a good rating.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
36151.6 in reply to 36151.5
Date: 6/24/2008 5:09:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
I don't get this at all :s
I mean, looking at my starting PF stats in this game ((4252961)) I'd say that he did a great job, however, he was rated only 4.5?
Sure he had a 4 personal fouls to his name, BUT shouldn't 12 points on 6-9 shooting and 10 rebounds along with 3 assists, 2 steals and 1 block grant him a bit better rating then just 4.5?

P. S.
It's not that those ratings really matter to me, I mean, if I'm personally satisfied with my player performance, I couldn't care less for them, but it's just too odd.

This Post:
00
36151.7 in reply to 36151.6
Date: 6/24/2008 5:16:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
It seems that personal ratings are mostly based on a player's skills, not his game stats.

This Post:
00
36151.8 in reply to 36151.7
Date: 6/24/2008 5:28:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
It seems that personal ratings are mostly based on a player's skills, not his game stats.


That's not true.

Defensive performance plays a big role in player ratings, and that generally isn't quantified in a boxscore.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
36151.9 in reply to 36151.7
Date: 6/24/2008 5:29:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
Yeah, I guess so, but that's stupid :/
Player ratings shouldn't have to do anything with player current skills, but only with his performance on the pitch.

This Post:
00
36151.10 in reply to 36151.9
Date: 6/24/2008 5:46:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Yeah, I guess so, but that's stupid
Player ratings shouldn't have to do anything with player current skills, but only with his performance on the pitch.


Player performance has everything to do with player skills. For this reason, player ratings and player skills are irreversibly intertwined. A player's performance reflects how he played against his opponent: I'd say a PF who scored 12 points but allowed the opposing PF to score twice that many has done well to get a 4.5 rating.

This Post:
00
36151.11 in reply to 36151.8
Date: 6/27/2008 11:06:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
That's not true.

Defensive performance plays a big role in player ratings, and that generally isn't quantified in a boxscore.

What puzzles me is that if we look at higher divisions and better players the stats would be mostly the same (which makes sense) but ratings are a lot higher. So defensive performance is solely responsible for the difference and skills don't contribute to player ratings whatsoever, correct?

This Post:
00
36151.12 in reply to 36151.11
Date: 6/27/2008 11:15:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Correct, it's whatever the performance was.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
36151.13 in reply to 36151.9
Date: 6/27/2008 5:27:06 PM
Balls of Steel
IV.10
Overall Posts Rated:
123123
performance on the pitch


this isnt soccer (football)

the playing surface is a court

This Post:
00
36151.14 in reply to 36151.13
Date: 6/28/2008 4:52:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
So? I mean, did you understood what I tried to say with that? You did? I mean, if I had to take a wild guess I'd say that you did 'cause otherwise you wouldn't correct me, right(?) but then again, if you did then why would you correct me?
You don't have to answer. That was just a rhetorical question :D

Advertisement